Re: [SAtalk] Load Balancing: Was Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-16 Thread Billy Huddleston
That's just it, one person says run them all on the same machine, you say keep'm separate.. I'm more incline to keep's separate for simplicity sake... Who the heck knows.. Thanks, Billy - Original Message - From: "Scott Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SAtalk] Load Balancing: Was Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-16 Thread Billy Huddleston
So your saying run Qmail & spamc/spamd on the same machine.. on all the nodes.. and use my LVS director to direct the smtp traffic to each node as needed? Thanks, Billy - Original Message - From: "Andreas Stollar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Billy Huddlesto

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-15 Thread Billy Huddleston
Are you all load balancing these? If so, are you doing it at the SMTP level or using SPAMD ? I'm getting ready to implement a 2 node system with qmail..and wondering if using a single SMTP machine calling spamc against a cluster of SA machines running SPAMD is better/worse the running 2 machines

[SAtalk] Just got a piece of spam through.. had 0pt font size?

2004-01-07 Thread Billy Huddleston
nks, Billy +--+ | Billy Huddleston Senior Systems Administrator | | Net-Express http://www.nxs.net | | 114 Sherway Rd. Voice: 865-691-2011 | | Knoxville,

Re: [SAtalk] Smart SPAM

2004-01-06 Thread Billy Huddleston
I've got a complete list of domains that I used with some procmail scripts for some time now part of a set of scripts called "purveyors".. I have NO idea how many of them are still valid or how much they overlap with bigevil.cf at this time, however, I'm willing to send you the procmail receipes s