RE: [SAtalk] success stories with SA ?

2003-01-15 Thread Andrew M. Hoying
We do internet <-> [SA/virus scanner gateway] <-> [sendmail server] <-> [exchange server] Some clients on the sendmail server, some on the exchange server. SA works great for us, 300 employees, 5000 messages a day to/from the internet (33-45% spam) Andrew > -Original Message- > From: Ste

RE: [SAtalk] RE: OT: Dynamically updating /etc/mail/access

2003-01-09 Thread Andrew M. Hoying
y, January 09, 2003 11:02 AM > To: Andrew M. Hoying; MailScanner mailing list > Cc: SpamAssassin Users' list > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RE: OT: Dynamically updating /etc/mail/access > > > Isn't that the point of DNS RBLs? > > | -Original Message- > |

[SAtalk] RE: OT: Dynamically updating /etc/mail/access

2003-01-09 Thread Andrew M. Hoying
I'm including the spamassassin list in this because I think it is relevant there as well. Has anyone thought about starting some kind of distributed (like razor and dcc) or community (like spamassassin) based effort to build a near real time access list like this? Obviously this list doesn't catch

RE: [SAtalk] installing DCC and pyzor breaks spamc but not spamassassin

2002-11-15 Thread Andrew M. Hoying
I had this happen on one of my systems as well, I never figured out the cause. It was after I installed dcc, I didn't install pyzor. I ended up just setting it to run spamassassin as it is a low volume mail server. Andrew > -Original Message- > From: Jon Gabrielson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC