On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:23:36PM -0400, Tim Johnson wrote:
> Thanks, is amavisd-new linked from the Spamassassin homepage?
Probably, but just in case:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
Greets,
_Alain_
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
n ham
though (not even sure that'd be something reasonable to do it on every
ham message).
What you can do (and what I do) is invoking sa-learn --ham ... on the
files containing the false positives reported by your user. You should
run this as the user running the amavisd-new daemons.
Gre
Hello readers,
I've googled around but I've failed to find anything that resembles
what our mail gateway has suddenly started experiencing: the nightly
sa-learn --rebuild --force-expire stuck forever (shows with 'D' state
in 'ps auxw' -> uninterruptible IO wait) and using _huge_ amounts of
Hello,
Before I re-invent the wheel, has anyone added support for amavisd-new
logs to spamstats? (http://www.gryzor.com/tools/#spamstats)
Nice tool (merci Vincent) but doesn't seem to grok log entries generated
by amavisd-new.
If no one has yet, I'll do it shortly.
Greets,
_Alain_
---
Hello,
Hope I won't get flamed for this, but I haven't found anything in the
FAQs.
One user reported an undected spam to me (quoted below, headers
included). Your usual Nigerian scam-style spam. It got 3.8 points, but
according to the rules matching, it should get 5.0 (it does if I run
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 02:49:10PM -0700, Patrick Murphy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running Spamasssassin / Spamass-Milter on Solaris 8 with Sendmail
> 8.12.9. I want to be able to have identified spam placed in a per user
> spam file without the spam appearing in the users Inbox.
>
> I understand th
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:42:33AM +0930, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've got spam assassin working like a dream on our small sendmail box.
> works like a bought one.what i want to do is setup a gateway arrangment
> for an Exchange Server (everyone shudders, i know).
>
> like so:
>
> Interne
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Gary Lopez wrote:
> Gurus of the spamassassin world,
No way I'm a guru, but...
>I am desperate need of help. I have spamassassin running on Solaris
> 8 using procmail. We relay messages to different offices around the
> world via thier ISP. The prob
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:15:59AM -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:47 AM
> Subject: OT: RE: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin
>
>
> > What I dont understand is why you guys dont just pass html
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:54:26PM +1000, Robin Whittle wrote:
> Thanks for this Abigail:
>
> > I would simply recommend that you raise the score in the
> > local.cf file for the SA test BASE64_ENC_TEXT to near or
> > above your minimum spam threshhold. I have yet to see a
> > *valid* email that
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 08:25:22AM +0200, Atlas wrote:
> Hi,
> I had this script instead of regular qmail-queue:
>
> spamassassin | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue-real
>
> This worked almost perfectly.
> I tried this script qmail-queue:
>
> spamassassin > /tmp/mail_file.txt
> cat /
Hello,
>
> I am running spammassasin on a RH linux box with postfix and
amavisd-new.
So do I.
>
> - How do I confirm that spamassassin is actually processing the SPAM and
> learning it into its bayes db ?
You should get log entries in your /var/log/maillog related to
amavisd-
12 matches
Mail list logo
