On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:15:59AM -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:47 AM > Subject: OT: RE: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin > > > > What I dont understand is why you guys dont just pass html messages thru > the > > rendering core of Mozilla and extract the text as the viewer would see. > This > > would eliminate all the attempts to obscure the message. And any message > > with screwed up text after rendering can be checked easily enough.
lynx -dump would probably be a more lightweight alternative, although forking lynx for every message still probably has an unacceptable cost. > > Can you submit a patch with that functionality, please? I'm not the person this comment is directed to, but I had a plan to experiment patching in a call to lynx -dump and measure the impact. It's still very much at the project level though :-( On the postfix-users list, someone recently suggested a body_check rule for Postfix that counts the occurences of <!-- on a line and triggers at more than 3. This could help catch some cases of HTML comment obsfuscation (sp???). Is SA doing something like this already or should it be a local rule? Greets, _Alain_ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
