Re: [SAtalk] ok_locales xx

2003-01-10 Thread Adrian Ho
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 07:43:46PM -0600, Mike Vanecek wrote: > This statement > Which locales (country codes) are considered OK to receive mail from. > > seems to conflict with this statement > If you wish SpamAssassin to block spam in foreign languages, set this to the > locale which matches yo

Re: [SAtalk] OT: Reply-To headers (was: No tag?)

2002-12-13 Thread Adrian Ho
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 06:30:08PM +0100, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > Exactly, which is why I, on my own lists, always set a reply-to to the list if > there's no reply-to set already; meaning that unless the sender says otherwise > the reply goes to the list, just as he wants it to. Hint: Broken a

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin new rule..newbie alert

2002-11-16 Thread Adrian Ho
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:31:37AM +, Martin Radford wrote: > At Fri Nov 15 17:53:22 2002, Steve Thomas wrote: > > > > I wouldn't recommend doing this, though. E-mail addresses are not case > > sensitive, > > That's not correct. Neither, strictly speaking, is your assertion. The correct ans

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin and qmail setup.

2002-11-08 Thread Adrian Ho
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:17:41PM -0500, Mike Griffin wrote: > cd into defaultdelivery and edit the rc file: > # Using spamassassin to check emails before > # Using qmail-local to deliver messages to ~/Maildir/ by default. > |spamc -c -f(the first character is a `pipe`) > ./Maildir/ > [...] >

Re: [SAtalk] protecting email from SpamAssassin

2002-11-06 Thread Adrian Ho
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:10:59PM +0800, Adrian Ho wrote: > Does all the mail that originates inside your network have to be relayed > through your mail servers? If so, consider setting up a separate > mail relay that doesn't run SpamAssassin and is only accessible from > wi

Re: [SAtalk] protecting email from SpamAssassin

2002-11-06 Thread Adrian Ho
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:16:32PM -0500, Ben Rosengart wrote: > I want to protect mail that originates inside our network. Such > mail carries return addresses from many different domains. In > addition, there is no requirement that mail with a panix.com return > address must originate inside ou

Re: [SAtalk] A few SA/mutt questions

2002-10-30 Thread Adrian Ho
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:37:25PM -0500, Dave Slusher wrote: > 2) For those who use mutt, how can I bind multiple actions to a > single keypress? With macros -- simply list the desired keypresses in sequence. > What I have now is a key bound for the reporting. > What I want to do is to have on

Re: [SAtalk] Need help interfacing with local RBL

2002-10-30 Thread Adrian Ho
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:30:51PM -0600, Ken Causey wrote: > Yes, and the problem is that I am not running a seperate RBL server. Um, rbldns /is/ a separate RBL server. > I simply want a process on the mail server listening only on localhost. > There is only one mail server and I have no interes

Re: [SAtalk] Need help interfacing with local RBL

2002-10-29 Thread Adrian Ho
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:55:47AM -0600, Ken Causey wrote: > However this doesn't seem to be working: The tests you performed were manually directed at the rbldns server. However, RBL queries are done using standard DNS lookups, and are therefore subject to the normal DNS recursive lookup algorit