Cliff Browning wrote, Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:39 PM
> I went to the spamassassin.org site today and the list of tests is not
> there. Could you please put it back.
It's still at http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html - easily reachable via
the `Tests' link about half-way through the set of li
Giles Coochey wrote, Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:50 AM
> Don't do that!
Why not?
> gate# host sitefinder.verisign.com
> sitefinder.verisign.com has address 12.158.80.10
That's rather irrelevant - 64.94.110.11 never was the address of sitefinder.
It is, however, the IP returned by the wildc
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 17:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With all the talk about Osirusoft, I didn't even know that orbs was dead!
Dorkslayers died a death some months ago, after the nameservers were hit
by over 6500 machines in 17 seconds in May, each making multiple queries
(and that was the trou
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 18:43, Gary Carr wrote:
> SA is flagging 100% of the incoming email with the RCVD_IN_ORBS score. Even
> mail from our internal network. None of the ip addresses are listed in
[...]
> Has the orbs.dorkslayers.com gone the way of Osirusoft?
dorkslayers has been dead as a doorna
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 17:54, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:36:02PM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> > that I can just add?
>
> The point is moot. Sobig.F expired on 10-Sep-2003, due to an
> internal timebomb.
The timebomb appears to be somewhat of a damp squib.
Our mail ser
Bob Proulx wrote, Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:13 AM
> Chuck Peters wrote:
> > I was having a minor problem with spamassassin 2.53 (OSIRUSOFT) and
> > decided to do a search for backports of Debian stable (Google
spamassassin
> > site:people.debian.org) ...
>
> I assume you found Duncan's backport
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 23:32, Yackley, Matt wrote:
> I noticed this as well, after having long, long lookup times for the past
> couple of days, it started claiming just about every IP that connected to us
> was on the list. It really seems to have gone belly up or someone just set
> it to respond
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 22:33, James Miller wrote:
> With all the trouble OSIRUSOFT is having, is it time to stop using them?
[...]
> And to add to it, they are (have been since Friday) under a DDoS attack,
> their web site is down, mail is not flowing to them (because of the attack I
> assume)
It's
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 18:10, Roland Lieger wrote:
Slightly off-topic, but if you're going to propose blocking extensions
for a particular reason, at least make sure that the reason is correct.
:-)
[...]
> Valid extensions for Windows programs files (that should be found) are:
>.vbs, .vbe, (v
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 21:54, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Do you have a specific kind of help you need, or should we assume it's an
> accidental PEBAC?
PEBKAC (or PEBCAK), surely? :-)
The problem needs to exist between the chair and something else...
Adam
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
