Re: [SAtalk] Change default

Hello Andrea, Sunday, October 26, 2003, 6:14:37 PM, you wrote: AR> Hi, AR> I would change this test in sa: AR> 0.5 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match AR> Normally is 0.5, I need to increment this. AR> Could I do this in my local.cf? Yes, for system-wide effect, or in user_prefs

Re: [SAtalk] Filtering mailsl without text

Hello Andrea, Sunday, October 26, 2003, 6:08:02 PM, you wrote: AR> Hi folks, AR> Now I'm receiving spam: AR> - "hi" as subject AR> - without text in the body (html or not). AR> Have you got any idea to filter those? I think I've developed a set of filters for that. They have a content type of

[SAtalk] Change default

Hi, I would change this test in sa: 0.5 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match Normally is 0.5, I need to increment this. Could I do this in my local.cf? Thanks Andrea --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Pro

[SAtalk] Filtering mailsl without text

Hi folks, Now I'm receiving spam: - "hi" as subject - without text in the body (html or not). Have you got any idea to filter those? Thanks very much Andrea --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] yahoo redirect

On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 10:28:54AM -0400, Keith C. Ivey wrote: > Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yahoo is well aware of the SA rules. Any new redirectors they > > add will not trigger those rules and not be open to abuse > > either. > > I'm not sure what you mean. The problem is

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] yahoo redirect

On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 12:57:40PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Jeremy Zawodny writes: > >On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 02:58:06PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: > >> Chris Santerre writes: > >> >The default rule in 2.60 is (May wrap in your email viewe

[SAtalk] Why does razor2 work with spamassassin -D but not through procmail?

I'm running spamassassin in my home directory (~/bin) and have compiled razor, dccproc, and pyzor, which all work fine when tested with SpamAssassin -D. However, while dccproc and pyzor are regularly triggered on spam run through procmail, razor never is. Specifically, when I run 'spamassassin -D

[SAtalk] Installing from source on Mandrake 9.1

Hi, I'm using Mandrake 9.1 Using this way of installing: The easiest way to do this is using CPAN.pm, like so: perl -MCPAN -e shell[as root] o conf prerequisites_policy ask install Mail::SpamAssassin quit While doing the testing phase, this is

RE: [SAtalk] Why does razor2 work with spamassassin -D but not through procmail?

I figured it out. The issue was that my procmail was using /usr/bin/spamassassin which had the razor compile-time option turned off. I needed to be using ~/bin/spamassassin. The different results were due to different executables. - dan -- Dan Kohn

Re: [SAtalk] Why does razor2 work with spamassassin -D but not through procmail?

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Dan Kohn wrote: > debug: executable for dccproc was found at /home/dankohn/bin/dccproc > > Could someone please tell me why razor triggers in the former but not > the latter? You're sure the PATH contains $HOME/bin when procmail is invoked by sendmail? --

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Re: [OT] What is next step?

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Justin Mason said: > I have seen addresses munged as follows (perl code to illustrate): > > s/nospam//i; > s/spam//i; > tr/A-Z/a-z/; A lot of spamware gets confused by email addresses containing $ signs; I've used that as a Usenet reply-to for years, and I s

RE: [SAtalk] Totally whitelisting someone?

Paul Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just ran it, so I guess we'll see what I get back when this > reply to the list comes back in - I think I have problems > getting my head around some of the options, to me > "--remove-addr-from-whitelist" means I'm not whitelisted, not > that I am, IYSWI

Re: [SAtalk] filter by recieved time question

On 2003-10-25 19:22:56 -0700, lindsay adams wrote: > is this something i can do in spamassassin? or is there a procmail way > of doing things? How about switching between two user_prefs with different required_hits via cron? Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROT

[SAtalk] How does whitelist_from and trusted_networks works?

Hi! I have problems with using whitelist_from and trusted_networks options in spamassasin 2.6. I have local configuration files in /etc/mail/spamassassin directory. Spamassassin reads this directory but it seems that they are ignored. I added some whitelist_from email addresses, but e-mails from t

Re: [SAtalk] Error in mail logs relating to SPAMD

At Sun Oct 26 01:36:05 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The error i am seeing relates to spamd & it is as follows > Still running as root: user not specified with -u, not > found, or not set to root. Fall back to nobody. > I did try n add this in the init script for spam > assassin under the

RE: [SAtalk] Totally whitelisting someone?

> 1) this issue should be fixed in 2.60.. it has a change to > the AWL so that > it ignores GTUBE. hmm.. I'm running 2.60, upgraded from 2.55 via CPAN > 2) do a --remove-addr-from-whitelist, instead of an add... this will > completely reset the AWL for the address passes. add will > only give

[SAtalk] error in ASCII_FORM_ENTRY?

We are using SpamAssassin version 2.55. One of our users sends mail that includes the following HTML in the signature as a divider: (Yes, an could be used, but that's not the point.) When someone replies from the internet, the signature is indented with spaces