At 03:16 AM 10/6/03 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
>>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
>> version=2.60
>>Why is autolearn=no ?
> What are your autolearn thresholds set to?
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 7
well, then it won
At 04:54 AM 10/5/03 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
Hallo SA-List,
since I upgraded of V 2.60 have I no tests (only bayes).
--snip
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60
--snap
Why is autolearn=no ?
What are your autolearn thresholds set to?
Bear in mi
Hallo Matt Kettler,
am Montag, 6. Oktober 2003, 03:00:29, schriebst Du:
> At 04:54 AM 10/5/03 +0200, Jim Knuth wrote:
>>Hallo SA-List,
>>
>> since I upgraded of V 2.60 have I no tests (only bayes).
>>--snip
>>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
>> versio
At 07:47 AM 10/5/03 -0400, David M. Carney wrote:
Is this right, and what's it trying to tell me, in particular, the "Learned
from 0 message(s)" part?
Usualy this means that it has already learned those messages, probably due
to the autolearn function.
SA tracks the message ID's of the messages
Dan Doucette (Dano) wrote:
> I'm getting an error message in just one of my user's procmail logs. The
> error is; 'procmail: Error while writing to "caughtspam"'
That is really a procmail question not a spamassassin question.
Does your syslog and/or maillog say anything interesting? Usually
/var
I am using SA 2.55 on a redhat 7.2 machine.
I want to catch email with subjects that begin with:
=?us-ascii?
I used:
header gej_US_ASCII Subject =~ /\=\?us-ascii\?/i
describe gej_US_ASCII blah blah
score gej_US_ASCII 1.0
Checked with --lint, but there was no hit on the rule. Variations
David Wrote:
>
> I'm a real spamassassin newbie. I'm using spamassassin version 2.60. My mail
> is stored in /var/mail/david.
> I recently received three non-spams. So I thought I give sa-learn a tryout.
> This is what I did:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sa-learn --ham --mbox /var/mail/david
> Learned f
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2543
This bug is marked as "resolved" with a target milestone of 2.70.
Does this mean that there is no fix/patch available, and will not be
until 2.70 is released?
In the interim, I'd recommend disabling the rule by adding the following
to your
Here's a good one for ya. Looks like the [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoted from books.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from otakumail.com ([200.43.110.86]) by mta007.verizon.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
We have been running SA 2.55 for quite some time for a large user base
without Bayes support. It has worked great, but as of late, more and more
spam is getting through (as expected) and we are looking to upgrade to
2.60. A few questions:
- Our users probably are not going to be able to feed sp
Gwen Morse wrote:
How do you run SpamAssassin. I'll bet you a dollar
SA's not what's saying it's possible spam. You're probably running
it through a helper app that's interpreting SA's output incorrectly.
I'm running it through spamc, as my initial message
indicated.
Please Paypal that do
The first line of /usr/local/bin/pyzor has a #! line directing it to
python. Check to see that python is found at that location.
Mojo
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Scott Rothgaber wrote:
> >>Here is what I see when I run spamassassin --lint -D
>
> Speaking of which, I've been meaning to post this for q
Hi Dan,
Is it possible that this file was created on a Windows host and then moved
into the user's home? I have seen this happen if the .procmailrc file is
either corrupt or if it has control characters, like a line return, that was
not produced in a *nix format.
--Larry
> -Original Messag
Hello all.
I'm a real spamassassin newbie. I'm using spamassassin version 2.60. My mail
is stored in /var/mail/david.
I recently received three non-spams. So I thought I give sa-learn a tryout.
This is what I did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sa-learn --ham --mbox /var/mail/david
Learned from 0 message
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 10:36:51AM +0200, Hendrik wrote:
> First Question: Why does SA prints out "autolean=no" when the
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf says:
>
> # Enable Bayes auto-learning
> auto_learn 1
>
> ???
It does not do auto-learning on every mail. Imagine if
Learning from 1000 messages takes a while. Perhaps you didn't wait long enough?
Try running
sa-learn --spam -D --file /tmp/spam.mbx
so you see what is happening. *Then* you know if it really hangs..
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Wornan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED
kind of a repost of my previous question. But i dont see any use of
check_for_sender_no_reverse that shows up in EvalTest.pm. Can i use
this and apply my own score to it? Why is there no score associated
with this test?
thanks
adam
---
Th
Hi,
Just before upgrading to the new 2.60 Release, I read through
to documentation to see what has changed. But some things are
not clear to me. Maybe someone's able to bring some light to me?
http://eu.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#network%20test%20options
| trusted_networks
Thanks Matt.
> >I received a spam that got scored only 4.4 yet it had
> >BAYES_80 as well as FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD.
> >
> >I'm not very familiar with how much these tags _should_
> be >scored, but shouldn't a FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD have a
> >reasonably high score? And BAYES_80, typically how much
> do
Yes, and the answer is...
PROCMAIL!
(I sound like a, er, "scratched CD.")
Since SpamAssassin only tags the email, something else has to make the
decisions on what should be done with it afterward. PROCMAIL can examine the
headers, look at the X-Spam-Score field, do a test against it, and redirec
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 06:16:01PM -0400, David M. Carney wrote:
> I'm pasting the script below this message. Will this procmail
> script cause my spams to be saved somewhere?
It seems to save mails to mailboxes almost-certainly-spam and
probably-spam. It does not throw away anything. You can ope
Here is what I see when I run spamassassin --lint -D
Speaking of which, I've been meaning to post this for quite some time...
debug: executable for pyzor was found at /usr/local/bin/pyzor
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/local/bin/pyzor
debug: entering helper-app run mode
debug: Pyzor: got response
Title: Nachricht
Hi
List,
Perhaps someone can
tell me why this happens.
# cut
#
My Postfix
Mailserver got some mail, parse it through SA and want to tell me following in
the Mail Header:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
styx.homeunix.orgX-S
--- Patrick Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gwen Morse wrote:
>
> >2) below is the result of my test of
> >sample-nonspam.txt. I find it confusing because
> >although it scores 0.0/5.0 (Which I assume reads a
> 0
> >total score when 5 is the default for it to be
> spam),
> >the message *says*
Robert Nicholson wrote:
Currently I have my perlscript running on a non-plex box and everything
works fine in that
everything is shell account based and SA picks up my ~/.spamassassin
That's what I would expect, then. Since you're running the script as
user robert (or whatever), SA looks in you
I just authored and sent a lenghty note - typed it in Word and then cut
and pasted it over into Netscape 7.1
Having upgraded from Spamassassin 2.4 to 2.6 I have been seeing wierd
behavor under Exim, so I reset the mail system to Sendmail which did
work.
Can someone clue me into what's going on he
Hi list, i have some questions about sa-learn.
It is possible to run sa-learn while spamd is running?
It is possible to run sa-learn --rebuild while spamd is running?
TIA
German Staltari
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to
Hi all -
I have been bussy settiing up the new version of Spamassassin 2.6 and
it's utilities as suggested by the folks at peregrinehw.com. The
install seemed to go without a problem and I have not modified the
default "local.cf"
I had been running Spamassassin 2.4 for quite a while with no tro
28 matches
Mail list logo
