Re: [SAtalk] bayes db version

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:12:54PM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote: > Output: > 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: bayes db version > > Which indicates they are using the older version of the bayes dbase? Yes. That's version 0 (ie: 2.5x) > On other users I see that the bayes dbas

Re: [SAtalk] hardware recomendations

On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 04:56:34AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 01:57 PM 8/30/03 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Until it died of hardware failure, I had a P150 with qmail, spamc/spamd, > >and a lightly loaded Apache handling about 6K messages/day. CPU load was > >always in the .2-.3 range, e

[SAtalk] Using spamc

I am trying to develop a connection with spam assassin where the mail message is contained in a MySQL database using either PHP or Perl. Perhaps I'm too tired or just haven't had enough coffee, but I can't seem to get it to work...can someone walk me through it. THX --Lee Mahan Chief Technolog

RE: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages

Did anyone ever figure out a fix for this on Exchange 2000? It will be a while before I can migrate to 2003. Thanks, Ryan -Original Message- From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:39 PM To: Bingham, Ryan; Tom Meunier; Martin Bene Cc: [EMAIL

[SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd doesn't work

I use spamassassin 2.55 with mimedefang, I want to use whitelist_from_rcvd in /etc/mail/local.cf : whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] tuwien.ac.at but somehow it doesn't work, spamassassin doesn't give whitelist score (-100) for email coming from email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at. but if I save the sam

Re: [SAtalk] Text in Subject: Triggering BODY Rule?

At Wed Aug 27 21:39:30 2003, Kai MacTane wrote: > > Am I just blind, or is this completely undocumented in the > Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf docs? Looking at > http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html, I see the > following: > > body SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAME /pattern/modifiers >

Re: [SAtalk] SQL

Hi Ray, > Here is what happens when i send data to spamc: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat sample-spam.txt | spamc This isn't the sample-spam.txt from the SpamAssassin source tarball, isn't it..? It would be nice if you can post it. These lines... > X-Mail-Format-Warning: Bad RFC2822 header fo

Re: [SAtalk] exchange and IMAP Public Folder messages

Did anyone ever figure out a fix for this on Exchange 2000? It will be a while before I can migrate to 2003. To recap: the problem involves retrieving intact headers from messages moved to Public Folders on Exchange 2000. Thanks, Ryan -Original Message- From: Covington, Chris [mailto:

[SAtalk] All mail hits RCVD_IN_SORBS

It's not that big a deal, but every message I have (ham and spam) is hitting RCVD_IN_SORBS and getting 0.1 points. Is the rule broken, or is there something strange about my mail? - dan -- Dan Kohn

[SAtalk] spamassassin not working with qmail-scanner..

heya folks,   thanx to Jason S. first, for bringing qmail-scanner in my life ;-) the test-installation-script works fine. i setup fprot too, both (spam. + fprot) working fine.   but now  i have a new problem! all mail comming from unknow hosts (like spam..) isn't scanned anymore. mail from

[SAtalk] dccifd support

The release notes for 2.60 mention that it supports dccifd. Has anyone used the dccifd interface on 2.60 yet? Could you post code using dccifd? --Luke --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/

[SAtalk] Bug: Failed to create default user preference file //.spamassassin/user_prefs

Hi, I am using version 2.55. When I run sa-learn from cron, I get this error: Failed to create default user preference file //.spamassassin/user_prefs Why does it try that? I don't want sa-learn to set user_prefs, certainly not in the root. What does it use to determine the users home director

Re: [SAtalk] Bug: Failed to create default user preference file //.spamassassin/user_prefs

At 01:50 PM 8/31/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote: What does it use to determine the users home directory? SpamAssassin uses ~/ to determine the home directory of the current user. And yes, that is standardized and should be implemented by your OS. -

[SAtalk] upgrade spamassassin from 2.44 to 2.55 on redhat 9

Hi, i have fetchmail, sendmail, procmail and spamassassin 2.44 running and everything works like a charm. as the description of the rpm-package of spamassassin says, i just added: PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin INCLUDERC=/etc/mail/spamassassin/spamassassin-default.rc to my /etc/proc

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes does work manually but not with spamc

Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Matt, > Your problem is that when you execute spamc from exim, you are telling > it to use a home directory of /tmp. This isn't likely the same home > directory you have when you execute spamassassin manually. The home_directory in exim.conf does not se

Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn

At Sat Aug 30 20:24:47 2003, Thomas Reed wrote: > Im new to the SA system and have a question about sa-learn. I have impleme= > nted SA at a site wide level and would like to set up 2 global mail folders= > , one for missed spam and one for misclassified spam, so users can move sai= > d messages

Re: [SAtalk] upgrade spamassassin from 2.44 to 2.55 on redhat 9

At 02:47 PM 8/31/03 +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote: But NOTHING is filtered anymore? Why? First thing I'd suggest is running spamassassin --lint. This will tell you if spamassassin is unhappy with your user_prefs or local.cf and is spitting it out as a result. There are a few options that were pre

[SAtalk] Re: LOW score 0.6 why????

Well it scored better over here : Sat 2003-08-30 19:26:03: -- Sat 2003-08-30 19:30:38: Spam Filter processing e:\mdaemon\localq\dragonrm.msg... Sat 2003-08-30 19:30:38: > Message return-path: Sat 2003-08-30 19:30:38: > Message from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat 2003-08-30 19:30:38: > Message to:

Re: [SAtalk] Min Score

> If you upgrade to 2.60 you need to set your autolearn ham score to 0, > instead of the default of -2 in 2.55. > > By default shouldn't the auto-learn threshold for 2.60 be set to 0? > (not at a shell prompt so can't look right now.) > If not I think it should be, otherwise it won't learn ham. > >

Re: [SAtalk] OSIRUSOFT

So the zone file is cryptographically signed, so another sharer cannot change it? This would remove a single DOS target for spammers. But you have to transfer the whole zone file from peer to peer? > This seems like a perfect application for P2P technology; make rbldns or > rbldnsd trivial to conf

[SAtalk] SQL

I am trying to get my spamassassin install to use the SQL database for user prefs. I have in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf user_scores_dsnDBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost user_scores_sql_username spam user_scores_sql_password spam user_scores_sql_table userpref I then have spamd starting w

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin in vhost env

On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:52:14AM +0200, Alexander Newald wrote: > /home/vhost/.spamassassin/bayes_toks) I also didn't manage to get userprefs > from db. What about the -u option of spamc? -- Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This sf.net em