At 04:58 PM 8/4/2003 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
>Theoretically Theo Van Dinter fixed this a long time ago in this bug:
>
>http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1475
>
>But looking at the code, the fix isn't in 2.43, 2.44, 2.50, 2.52, 2.54 or
>2.55.
it is in 2.60 though ;)
Ouch.. it's bee
- Original Message -
From: "Chadwick L. Sorrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 6:20 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] OT: ASPAB
> Hello,
>
> I just wanted to take the time to let everyone know about a new
> blacklist, based on the access file Postfix uses
How do I create a bayes database?
When I run:
sa-learn --spam --file -p //spam.assassin.prefs.conf --single
< spam.msg
I get the messages:
Learned from 0 messages.
Thanks
Jan Elmqvist Nielsen
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-bu
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:48:12PM +0100, Angel Gabriel wrote:
> I have just installed SA on my laptop, and i want to get it working,
> before i install it on my netork systems. The trouble is, all spam seems
> to STILL be getting through, without being marked.
All that SA does is add headers to
Sorry to resend this, but I got no replies the first time.
I am trying to get spamassassin pulling per user prefs from a mysql db and
it does not seem to be even trying. I am following the debugging steps in
the bottom of the sql readme by running spamd -d from the command line, and
injecting a s
Im running postfix with amavisd-new and spamassassin.
I was curious as to how I disable spamassassin from scanning email that is
sent out from my intranet.
Where can I specify this? Or is this something i need to configure in
amavisd-new?
Thank you.
Jas
-
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Daniel Carrera yowled:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:10:36PM +0300, Harri Pesonen wrote:
>>
>>This has probably been asked a zillion times, but why so low scores?
>
> I think that it's just to pick safe defaults. Bayes is only reliable
> after it's been well-trained.
The
> The default setup of DCC is to report all mail (automaticaly)
> to the DCC
> servers.
> You have to whitelist any mailing list that you receive in order to
> prevent them from being reported.
Wait a minute, I don't think that's true. By default DCC is a
client only and you can poll a
I apologize in advance if this is a redundant post. I sent the message
below to the list yesterday after subscribing, but have not seen it come
back from the list yet, so I'm trying again. Any and all responses
appreciated!
- Original Message -
> I am a new subscriber to both the Amavis
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 04:21, Robert Menschel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello Dave, Chris,
>
Hi, Excuse me if I contradict myself or say anything silly here, I'm
thinking out loud as much as anything :)
> Wednesday, August 6, 2003, 6:06:01 AM, Dave wrote:
>
> R
>From what I understand, spamassassin can only give a static score,
there is no way to have score between 0 and max-score. and if we need
a variable score we have to create several rules like
BAYES_00,BAYES_01,...,BAYES_99 , and let all these rules executed.
Although only the first rule will sca
> I filter on the received line:
>
> received: from mokes [210.58.26.191] by gwdg.de with
> MailMXPro(2195.5766);
>
> The MailMXPro seems to be unique for some spam mails. I did not
found
> this word in any other mail.
>
I tried to make a rule based on this observation, but when I
ran --lint, I r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Yorkshire,
Thursday, August 7, 2003, 9:41:16 AM, you wrote:
YD> Hi, Excuse me if I contradict myself or say anything silly here, I'm
YD> thinking out loud as much as anything :)
I think that's what we're all doing. And I'm not going to apologi
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:41:52PM -0600, Gary C. New wrote:
> Are there any efforts to intigrate user_prefs with ldap?
>
See Bug 2205. This is in production at some 350 sites now.
Kristian
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built A
well I'm to Linux, but I have alot of
experience in UNIX HP-UX 10.2 just that its been a while, but
we are non-profit , and all these firewalls and spam apps are very
expensive. we are a small 40 user org
- Original Message -
From:
Angel Gabriel
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Hi Angel,
> -Original Message-
> From: Angel Gabriel
> On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 21:08, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:48:12PM +0100, Angel Gabriel wrote:
> >
> > > I have just installed SA on my laptop, and i want to get
> > > it working, before i install it on my ne
I just want to know how long it's going to take for spammers to learn to
spoof MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and get by a
few filters. ;)
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [
> > rawbody MY_OBFUX /x(b|f|d|h|u)|dh|uj|vsh/i
> > describe MY_OBFUX X with unusual chars
> > score MY_OBFUX .45
XH also appears in
exhibit(s | ed | ion)
exhaust(ed | ion)
XU also appears in
sexual
luxury
I'm using Anagram Artist to find words which contain these pairs.
This is a good idea for
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 15:30, Larry Gilson wrote:
> Hi Angel,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Angel Gabriel
>
>
> > On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 21:08, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:48:12PM +0100, Angel Gabriel wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have just installed SA on my lapt
Hi!
Sorry for the low level question, but I want to make sure I am going in the
right direction. We're running netBSD 1.6 with Exim 4.2. my user directory
is /usr/pkg/etc/spamassassin.
do I just use the local.cf file in that directory?
Should the setup below allow mail to the domain whiting.ca a
That is
PLENTY! :) I'm running on 266 pentiums with 64!
Although
Squid likes memory. The more the better. Find an extra stick somewhere and give
it more if you can. But for the amount of users you said you had, 128 might be
fine.
(I still know
people running web sites off of 386s an
Does SA account for well-known tricks like replacing the letter O by the
number 0 in an email about "free hard-core p0rn" for instance?
Is there any way I can get SA to take this into account in all my rules?
Or do I have to do that by hand for every rule? I guess I can make rules
like:
body
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 05:29, Robert Menschel wrote:
snip
>
> YD> We could make more than one score file available for the same set of
> YD> rules, let people have the rules at any score they choose.
>
> I like that! (a) One set of files for the rules (a file for each class
> of rule (Fro
>> received: from mokes [210.58.26.191] by gwdg.de with
>> MailMXPro(2195.5766);
>>
>> The MailMXPro seems to be unique for some spam mails. I did not
found
>> this word in any other mail.
>>
>I tried to make a rule based on this observation, but when I
>ran --lint, I received a "failed to parse l
Hi Frank,
The local.cf file is a system file. I don't know exim but on a qmail setup it should
go into the /etc/mail/spamassassin directory since it is accessed by spamassassin
itself. What I'm trying to say is that it is not "user" specific in the sense that it
should go in all the users dir
> I have some domain mail that is getting tagged as spam that is in my
> whitelist.cf. It almost appears the math is getting computed backwards. If
> something is getting an auto-whitelist adjustment shouldn't it be a negative
> number? Better yet, if something is in the whitelist shouldn't it g
At 10:24 -0400 2003-08-07, Matt Kettler wrote:
>Read the very top of the README file.. which is something you should have
>done _before_ installing.
In theory.
Except I wasn't "installing" I was upgrading, under time pressure, because
people were insisting they would ignore bug reports and que
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 05:39, Robert Menschel wrote:
> CS> For those who may not see it, these are not the sender of the spam
> CS> domains, but the domain of the image hosts, often owned by spammers.
> CS> Therefore it is ever changing like a RBL. So submissions of these to
> CS> the Rule Emporium
After installing Spamassasin on Solaris 7 with Perl 5.8.0, I try to run
spamd.
It seems that spamd is running but I receive this message
"unix passed to setlogogsock, but path not available at
/usr/local/bin/spamd line 207"
What's wrong
Francis
---
Hello people!!
I need to translate (the red text) the information of the spamassassin in the message to my language, like that:
(HOW DO I??? HELPP!!)
THANKS!!!
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block simil
ok sorry, tokens. Is there a theory on how many tokens one should
keep? I have space and capacity for a large number of tokens, but dont
want to counter the effect bayes has by keeping too many tokens. Any
theory or rule of thumb to this?
thanks
adam
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 17:09, Theo Van Dint
31 matches
Mail list logo
