Re: [SAtalk] Bayes is enabled, but not being included in tests

2003-03-26 Thread Tim B
Don't know if this one of your problems or not, but you might want to look at adding: bayes_file_mode since you are using a site wide configuration. Also make sure the user that spamassassin is running as has the proper read and write permissions to the files defined in your bayes_path stateme

[SAtalk] Are there scoring bugs in 2.50?

2003-03-26 Thread Robert Nicholson
I'm getting a lot of messages come back with -xx.x hits lately. X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-22.2 required=1.0 tests=BAD_CREDIT,BAYES_20,CLICK_BELOW,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,USER_AGENT_PINE autolearn=ham version=2.50 This was obvious spam that was sent me. Ar

Re: [SAtalk] Expiry code needs tweaking?

2003-03-26 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:27:40AM -0800, David Rees wrote: > I've got a mbox with 200+ spams in it, re-running sa-learn doesn't learn > any new messages. Could it be that the expiry code expired too many > messages? This account received a lot of ham, but not a lot of spam. expire doesn't chang

Re: [SAtalk] /usr/bin/spamc: cannot open error

2003-03-26 Thread Clifton Royston
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:45:48PM -0600, Keith Olmstead wrote: > Well I did a few things that was suggested. Here is my procmailrc file, if you can > see something wrong let me know: > > PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin > MAILDIR=$HOME > DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/Maildir/ > LOGFILE=/home/user/procmail.

RE: [SAtalk] spamphrase scores? :)

2003-03-26 Thread Chris Santerre
Um, wow! Retract the claws please :) comments inline. > -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:25 PM > To: Chris Santerre; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamphrase scores? :) > > > I'd advise not editin

RE: [SAtalk] a very ugly spam trick

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Moncur
Which version of SpamAssassin are you running? When I run your message through 2.50 I get this: Start SpamAssassin results 4.70 points, 7 required; * 1.8 -- BODY: Spam is 100% natural?! * 1.0 -- BODY: Risk free. Suuurr * 1.0 -- BODY: Message is 10% to 20% HTML * 0.1 -- BODY: HTM