On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> ... any spammer smart enough to look at the SA scores will also be smart
> enough to run his emails through SA as a test and discover the
> deception.
Yeah, I thought about that, but it was still fun to speculate.
-
Yes, it's the equivalent of EICAR.. it was added to SA a while back in
response to people wanting some form of test to ensure that SA was actually
being called.. So there was a rule created with a test string that will
more-or-less force SA to tag the email, even if the user is whitelisted.
I d
Ok no wonder I was
confused! I'm looking at rule tweaks now that I got SA rocking (Albeit not 2.5x)
I wanted to simply add a spamphrase rule in my local.cf file for the words
"herbal medicine". So I checked out the scoring fileshehehhe wow! THe lowest
was 330!
quick google shows me me
[Sorry, I'm forwarding this to the list again cause I included an old reply-to
header that screws up anyone thread sorting in mutt.]
In the email below you'll see that in the body this message got scored
8.2 points but in the X-Spam-Status it only has hits=2.1 and it's not
getting tagged as spam.
Greetings to the list,
i'll try to explain my problem:
i'm currently using a qmail system which act only as a relay system and i decided to
add a spam protection.
So i patched qmail with QMAILQUEUE patch, recompiled, installed and tested it (the patched qmail works perfectly).
Then i installed Spa
I've dug around the readmes but can't seem to get my mind around this...
I'm running a site wide config of mime-defang and using spamassassin to scan
for spam. I have been running a site wide bayes database and have been running
sa-learn --rebuild against it every 6 hours...
My questions:
1) W
> "SR" == Sönke Ruempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> SA is not writing directly to your mail storage. It is handing it off
>> to procmail or back to your MTA for final delivery. It is the
SR> but if the MTA requires CRLF, it would be great to have an option for that
Or better yet, get y
> >
> > Try 2.52, it should fix your issue.
>
> Is 2.52 available on CPAN? I checked yesterday and it hadn't replicated
> to the mirror I use as yet.
> --
> Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi, Andrew. I updated mine via CPAN mirror site last night. You should be
gold by now.
--Michel
> "SR" == Sönke Ruempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It is only a *must* when MTA speaks with MTA. SA is not an MTA, so it
>> can use native line encoding to speak with the local MTA.
>>
>> POP3 is not an MTA either... the RFC you cite has nothing to day about
>> how the local mail system
