On Friday, Feb 28, 2003, at 06:17 Canada/Mountain, Kevin Morwood wrote:
An interesting side-bar...
When my previous message arrived through the maillist it was
immediately
moved to the trashbin since the filter phrase was found in the message.
I might have to improve my filter slightly. :-)
if
On Friday, Feb 28, 2003, at 03:20 Canada/Mountain, Daniel J. Rachlin
wrote:
Your format change makes it so that I cannot filter and junk your
messages
from Outlook anymore. The **SPAM*** was obviously a good
recognizable filter pattern.
Way to make a positive impression! Congrats fro e
I meant to setup SA 2.5 with a unified Bayes filter but didn't remember
to do it. Now I have, but I want to preserve the bayes training that
has already gone on since I did not preserve the spam ovr the last week
or so...
So, can I?
--
It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once
On Friday, Feb 28, 2003, at 01:18 Canada/Mountain, Cliff Sarginson
wrote:
Mmm. I don;t know if this relevant but despite the name Outlook Express
and Outlook have no relationship to each other (except their origin of
course).
They write similar headers.
--
Living is easy with eyes closed, misunde
On Friday, February 28, 2003, 21:02:02, Kevin Morwood wrote:
> 1) The time it takes to investigate what is out there and whether it has the
> compelling features.
C'mon, that's easy. TheBat is the best Windows MUA out there ;-]
> 2) MSOE has a really bad format for their mail storage...so unless
On Friday, February 28, 2003, 19:11:34, Lucas Albers wrote:
> Question 1. How can I run spamc against the contents of my current mbox
> file? I want to check messages for spam, that are already in my mbox,
> and they arrived before I installed sa. Using this method I can
> automatically add items t
Duncan Findlay said:
> Hmm... this could be actually implemented.
> body EMAIL_ROT13 /\b[a-z(]-]+\^[a-z-]+\((?:pbz|arg|bet|pn)\b/
> I've put this in CVS for interest's sake.
dammit, I've had that in my own personal TODO list for a month now,
waiting for 2.50 to be released, and I forgot all a
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:54:10AM -0500, Frank Pineau wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:23:43PM +1100, Bill Clarke wrote:
> > > attached is a small perl script that does essentially what sa-learn
> > > --mbox does, except that the input (stdin) is a single message (like
> > > --single) which c
Bayes needs to have learned 200 spam AND 200 ham before it'll start applying
the BAYES rules to messages it scans.
* Jason Brunette ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Excel.Net,Inc. - http://www.excel.net/
* (920) 452-0455 - Sheboygan/Plymouth area
* (888) 489-9995 - Other areas, toll-free
> -Original Me
OK I might be missing something here, but this message was flagged as being
sent in the future.
The dates all look good to me.
What am I missing?? I get more then a fair share of these. I am running
Spam Assassin 2.50 and as you can tell it's being launched by MIMEDefang.
Received: from 66.129
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 February 2003 19:52
> To: 'Bob Rasey'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Exchange/Outlook, SA Bayes training, intact
> messages : an idea
>
>
> I do this now so I can find false positives and whitelis
11 matches
Mail list logo
