[SAtalk] Hi scores...

2003-02-23 Thread JP Kelly
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=27.2 required=5.0 tests=EXCUSE_14,FORGED_AOL_RCVD,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, HTTP_USERNAME_USED,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,ONLINE_PHARMACY, REMOVE_SUBJ,SUBJ_VIAGRA,TRACKER_ID,USERPASS,VIAGRA, VIAGRA_ONLINE,WITH_LC_SMTP version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: **

Re: [SAtalk] installation errors

2003-02-23 Thread Steven Efurd
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 21:28:19 -0500 Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 08:12:22PM -0500, Gerry Doris wrote: > > What's the difference between installing via CPAN or using your rpm's? > > In terms of code, nothing. You just don't get the tracking that RPM > give

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes and Nigerian spams

2003-02-23 Thread Gerry Doris
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:10:59PM +1300, Simon Byrnand wrote: > > Anyone agree/disagree with this ? The question is what to do about it, > > Well, all I can say is that it works pretty well for me. 2.50 has been picking off the Nigerian spams for m

Re: [SAtalk] Removing SpamAssassin

2003-02-23 Thread Bob Apthorpe
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:57:18 +1300 Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 14:31 21/02/03 +0100, you wrote: > >Simon Byrnand wrote on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:11:20 +1300: > > > > > If this option is set to 0, incoming spam is only modified by > > > adding some headers and no changes will be > >

Re: [SAtalk] New 2.50 "issue"

2003-02-23 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Ray Dzek wrote: > Feb 23 00:59:34 flare spamd[3452]: Cannot open bayes_path > /home/blah/.spamassassin/bayes R/W: File exists > Symbolic link pointing to nothing ? -- Regards Cliff Sarginson The Netherlands [ This mail has been checked as virus-f