Re: [SAtalk] bayes_path vs -H

2003-02-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:15:31PM -0500, Chadwick L. Sorrell wrote: > Is there any reason why bayes_path isn't defaulted to -H if specified in > spamd? I've had 2.50 running for awhile, but it wasn't autolearning > because it was still trying to put the lock file in /root/.spamassassin. Because

Re: [SAtalk] DNSBL scores pushed artifically low by Bayes trainingset (2.50-cvs 1.168-2003-02-09-exp)

2003-02-17 Thread Simon Lyall
On 17 Feb 2003, Nix wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Theo Van Dinter muttered drunkenly: > > score RCVD_IN_RFCI 0 1.771 0 1.249 > > score RCVD_IN_ORBS 0 0.458 0 0.121 > > Now those I believe; lower after Bayes kicks in... > > > score RCVD_IN_DSBL 0 2.225 0 4.295 > > ... but this is rather hard to beli

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Tomorrow's Crypto-Gram (fwd)

2003-02-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:59:33PM +, Martin Radford wrote: > I realise this is more a sendmail question than a spamassassin one, > but I guess someone might already have done this: is it possible to > get sendmail to accept mails sent to non-existent addresses so they > can be collected as "kn

Re: [SAtalk] How to tell if Bayes is working?

2003-02-17 Thread Tim B
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:05:00PM -0500, Tim B wrote: Thanks.. :) since the ones I'm using to teach 2.50 bayes filters were tagged as spam and non spam by 2.43 & 2.44 do I need to remove the spamassassin markup? sa-learn will remove the markup if it sees a X-Spam

Re: [SAtalk] DNSBL scores pushed artifically low by Bayes training set (2.50-cvs 1.168-2003-02-09-exp)

2003-02-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:18:21PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there a pserver that I can check out from instead? Sure: :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/spamassassin module is "spamassassin". Interestingly enough, this isn't listed on the SA download page... Justin? > Sorry -- I

[SAtalk] bayes_path vs -H

2003-02-17 Thread Chadwick L. Sorrell
Is there any reason why bayes_path isn't defaulted to -H if specified in spamd? I've had 2.50 running for awhile, but it wasn't autolearning because it was still trying to put the lock file in /root/.spamassassin. Is this an oversight or am I just missing some key function? Thanks! -- Chadwick

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Tomorrow's Crypto-Gram (fwd)

2003-02-17 Thread Martin Radford
At Mon Feb 17 20:14:34 2003, Justin Mason wrote: > > For example, ask anyone who operates a catch-all account for *@dom.ain > addresses On that subject, my system is a home Linux box with just a few accounts for family members. And I get messages sent to addresses who don't exist and have never

Re: [SAtalk] SA in different server ?

2003-02-17 Thread Ernesto Baschny
On 17 Feb 2003 at 14:14, Ramón Alvarez Rayo wrote: > we have a mail server with antivirus scanner, so we would like to install > SA in another server, is possible to run SA in another server different > that the mail server ? > > what do i need to do ? what packages are required ? You need spama

RE: [SAtalk] new faq entry

2003-02-17 Thread SpamTalk
Maybe Mail Corral on a gateway server would be a viable solution. Has anyone used this product? -Original Message- From: Tony Hoyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:11 AM To: 'Clayton, Nik [IT]'; Justin Mason Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] new faq

[SAtalk] How to tell if Bayes is working?

2003-02-17 Thread Tim B
How can I tell if the Bayes Filtering is working in 2.50? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PRO