RE: [SAtalk] X-Rot version

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, December 25, 2002 1:54 PM Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 the voices made Mike Loiterman write: > >> How would I block it at the MTA? I assume you're talking about Sendmail. >> What about a

RE: [SAtalk] X-Rot version

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, December 25, 2002 1:54 PM Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 the voices made Mike Loiterman write: > >> How would I block it at the MTA? I assume you're talking about Sendmail. >> What about a

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Conference.

On Sat, 27 Dec 2002 the voices made Andrew write: A> This may be a duplicate, but I saw it on Slashdot. MIT is holding a spam A> conference on Jan 17th,2003. Details are at A> http://www.spamconference.org. Check the speakerlist and you'll see that there are two people that will talk about SpamA

Re: [SAtalk] SPAMD zombie childs Bug?!

On 28.12.2002 1:00 Uhr, Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Even so I run it with the -m 2 flag, spamd leaves a zombie child for EVERY >> scanned message behind resulting in a totally overloaded system after a >> while (same when running without the -m flag). > > Stefan -- > > could you t

Re: [SAtalk] SPAMD zombie childs Bug?!

Still seems to have the zombie problems on my installation: USERPID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND bdysart2-0178 19940 10.0 0.0 00 ?? Z 4:30PM 0:00.00 (perl5.8.0) bdysart2-0178 18109 10.0 0.0 00 ?? Z 4:19PM 0:00.00 (perl5.

[SAtalk] Spam Conference.

This may be a duplicate, but I saw it on Slashdot. MIT is holding a spam conference on Jan 17th,2003. Details are at http://www.spamconference.org. Thanks. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkg

Re: [SAtalk] SPAMD zombie childs Bug?!

Stefan Seiz said: > Even so I run it with the -m 2 flag, spamd leaves a zombie child for EVERY > scanned message behind resulting in a totally overloaded system after a > while (same when running without the -m flag). Stefan -- could you try this with the latest CVS version (as of right now)? I

SV: [cleared] [SAtalk] Is this a spam?

Its spam. -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Pe vegne af Ross Vandegrift Sendt: 27. december 2002 19:59 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: [cleared] [SAtalk] Is this a spam? I'm not sure. The headers are obviously legit. The addressing is in the To field

Re: [SAtalk] Is this a spam?

At 10:59 AM 12/27/2002, you wrote: I'm not sure. The headers are obviously legit. The addressing is in the To field. The only shady thing about it is the recipient list. To the best of my knowledge, I don't know the sender and I don't know anyone else in the recipient list. It was sent on Chr

Re: [SAtalk] Is this a spam?

Did you request the email? Is the email something that you want? If you answered No, SPAM. If you answered Yes, ham. for me.. SPAM. - Original Message - From: "Ross Vandegrift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:59 AM Subject: [SAtalk] Is this

Re: [SAtalk] Is this a spam?

Did you request the email? Is the email something that you want? If you answered No, SPAM. If you answered Yes, ham. for me.. SPAM. - Original Message - From: "Ross Vandegrift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:59 AM Subject: [SAtalk] Is this

[SAtalk] Is this a spam?

I'm not sure. The headers are obviously legit. The addressing is in the To field. The only shady thing about it is the recipient list. To the best of my knowledge, I don't know the sender and I don't know anyone else in the recipient list. It was sent on Christmas Day. Should this mail be rep

[SAtalk] new spam indicator? multipart/mixed with only one bodypart

Yo! I repeatedly received mail (mostly nigerian $$$) with a multipart/mixed content type, and only one (text/plain) bodypart. I just wondered if there's enough of these messages to warrant a spamassassin rules (as, I think, no sane MUA generates such messages). The latest example (attached) woul

[SAtalk] A better way?

I've got over 700 lines of custom rules in my user_prefs file, and it generally works very well. But there are times when I find myself writing the same rule over and over again, with slight variations. For example: uri AmericaMessage /America-message/i score AmericaMessage 3 describe Amer

[SAtalk] spamassassin ignoring config

Hello, I'm using spamd through qmail-scanner on a qmail system. The problem is: spamd is doing its job, but it looks like it doesn't take into consideration my local.cf file. I have these statements: rewrite_subject 1 #report_header 0 defang_mime 0 subject_tag_string *SPAM* use_terse_repo

[SAtalk] SPAMD zombie childs Bug?!

OOPS! Apologies for the previous "empty" emails! Clicked resend while in the wrong message... SPAMD Version: 2.5.0 CVS - downloaded 27th Dec. 2002 14:00 CET Running on Mac OS X Server 10.1.5 I have spamd/spamc running in conjunction with CommuniGate Pro. spamd/spamc is called for every message

[SAtalk] SPAMD zombie childs Bug?!

-- DO NOT GIVE OUR ADDRESS TO THIRD PARTIES, WE HATE JUNK-MAIL _ Stefan Seiz | Fon+49 (0)700 STEFSEIZ | Fax+49 (0)7161 918699 Marstallstr. 32/1| Mobile +49 (0)172 / 7103366 D-73033 Göppingen

[SAtalk] SPAMD zombie childs Bug?!

-- DO NOT GIVE OUR ADDRESS TO THIRD PARTIES, WE HATE JUNK-MAIL _ Stefan Seiz | Fon+49 (0)700 STEFSEIZ | Fax+49 (0)7161 918699 Marstallstr. 32/1| Mobile +49 (0)172 / 7103366 D-73033 Göppingen

[SAtalk] Install failed on SpamAssassin using Cygwin on Win98

When installing Mail::SpamAssassin using Cygwin on Win98, I get the following errors: t/db_based_whitelist.Cannot open auto_whitelist_path /home/unknown/.spamassassin /auto-whitelist: Permission denied t/db_based_whitelist.ok 6/8 Not found: subj = Subject: 4000 Your V t/db_based_whitelist.FAI