[SAtalk] spamassassin-2.41-1.i386.rpm Install

Hi List, I just installed SpamAssassin from spamassassin-2.41-1.i386.rpm package. Problem is when I run spamd error encountered with message below: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ../lib /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1 /usr/lib/pe

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin munges the Content-Type?

On Sunday 17 November 2002 06:16 pm, Philip Mak wrote: > Is there a way to make SpamAssassin not munge the Content-Type of > messages suspected to be spam? (Is there a configuration option for > this, or would I have to edit the source code?) In the config file: defang_mime 0 -- Give a man a ma

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd dying issue

Glynn, From my experience, spamd occasionally dies under a fairly light load. then when spamc attempts to make the connection, it barfs.. use of the -f param saves the message and again, from what I've seen, the message is always delivered.. but the sender gets a nasty looking bounce messag

[SAtalk] Re: spamd dying issue

All, My spamassassin dies last November 15, 2002. Im using spamassassin-2.31 and got this bunch of message in my syslog and lots of procmail and spamd in the process: snip Nov 15 10:18:25 akirata spamc[13618]: connect() to spamd failed: Connection refused Nov 15 10:23:47 akirata spamc[1405

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin munges the Content-Type?

Is there a way to make SpamAssassin not munge the Content-Type of messages suspected to be spam? (Is there a configuration option for this, or would I have to edit the source code?) I use mutt to read my e-mail, so I'm not worried about HTML mail and other active content that could "call back" to

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin -r is slow

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:03:45PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:17:04PM -0500, Philip Mak wrote: > > Is there a way to make spamassassin -r run faster? > > > > I use the "mutt" terminal-based e-mail client. I have a macro for > > reporting spam messages (it runs spamas

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin -r is slow

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:17:04PM -0500, Philip Mak wrote: > Is there a way to make spamassassin -r run faster? > > I use the "mutt" terminal-based e-mail client. I have a macro for > reporting spam messages (it runs spamassassin -r on the message), but > every time I use it, I have to wait a few

[SAtalk] spamassassin -r is slow

Is there a way to make spamassassin -r run faster? I use the "mutt" terminal-based e-mail client. I have a macro for reporting spam messages (it runs spamassassin -r on the message), but every time I use it, I have to wait a few seconds for it to finish. -

Re: [SAtalk] Memory usage

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 09:30:39AM +0100, Claudio Clemens wrote: > Hi *, > > I hope this is not a FAQ. I was for a week or so in vacations, and in > the meantime, my mailbox got really full. When I fetched my mail, there > were more then 100 new mails. That is not so much, but the problem was > th

[SAtalk] Delivered-To Solution

Hi, in header INFORMATIK Delivered-To =~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ I forgot to escape the "@" Symbol. Now there is blabla\@blublu.bli and it works (sorry about that). I also lifted the header rules before the body rules, but that shouldn't habe been the problem. Cheers Claudio -- +- .''`. ---| C

Re: [SAtalk] Memory usage

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Search the archive. I had the same problem. My solution was changing from call spamassassin for any mail received to spamc/spamd and using the mda option in fetchmail instead of delievering via port 25 causing only one mail to be delievered (and proces

Re: [SAtalk] Semi Spamtrap

On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Claudio Clemens wrote: > Hi, > > I have an old e-mail address, which receive mostly SPAM (but not 100%). > I wrote a rule to give some points to e-mails headed to this address, > but the e-mails aren't caught. > > Here is the rule: > > header INFORMATIK Delivered-To

[SAtalk] AWL settings in user_prefs

Hi, what is the reason for auto_whitelist_path being privileged? I want to overwrite the setting from the global local.cf file in the user_prefs file. Otherwise whitelist_to will lower scores for SPAM and this will "poison" my global AWL. cu, Jan ---

[SAtalk] Memory usage

Hi *, I hope this is not a FAQ. I was for a week or so in vacations, and in the meantime, my mailbox got really full. When I fetched my mail, there were more then 100 new mails. That is not so much, but the problem was that my system began to swap like the hell. All RAM and SWAP were in use. Respo

[SAtalk] Semi Spamtrap

Hi, I have an old e-mail address, which receive mostly SPAM (but not 100%). I wrote a rule to give some points to e-mails headed to this address, but the e-mails aren't caught. Here is the rule: header INFORMATIK Delivered-To =~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ describe INFORMATIK Benutzt al