I just upgraded our server to SpamAssassin 2.4, now that its available
through FreeBSD ports ... I've got Razor-agents installed, as well as
Pyzor.
I'm using spamcheck.py to act as an LMTP filter between postfix and cyrus
IMAPd ...
I have it running with the following options:
/usr/local/bin/s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We received a Nigerian variant that only produces 5.60 hots here.
*SPAM* BUSINESS PROPOSAL
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 16:08:58 +0100
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If this is anything new, I will be happy to zip it up and send
At 22-09-2002 14:24 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) wrote:
>yep, download 2.41, read the INSTALL doc, specifically the bit about
>installing SpamAssassin as a normal, non-root user.
>
>Main problem will probably be that your ISP does not have up to date
>perl modules installed. that can
Gary Funck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-21 13:59:38 -0700]:
> Our mail server computer is offline at the moment, so we substituted
> a spare, which generally has the same OS and software, but differs
> in a few regards. It
> [...]
> The -P flag used to be in the recipe, but I removed it after
> up
Yup...Sendmail was already configured to use procmail as the local
delivery agent...calling it, again, via the .forward file, was confusing
the issue.
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Fogarty, Chris wrote:
> Oddly when I removed the .forward, I stared getting the
>
> ***SUSPECTED SPAM***
>
> he
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 11:37:49AM -0400, Fogarty, Chris wrote:
> So it seems to work through procmail without .forward. Does anyone know
> why this might be?
Is procmail your local delivery agent (LDA)? ala:
$ grep ^Mlocal sendmail.cf
Mlocal, P=/usr/bin/procmail, F=lsDFMAw5:/|@qSPfhn9,
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:33:48PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> I seem to be getting a *lot* of spam relayed via these guys recently.
> Can others confirm this?
>
> if it's the case, I'll come up with a forged-hostname test for it.
I do get some from them, typically some dsl.telesp.net.br host:
Oddly when I removed the .forward, I stared getting the
***SUSPECTED SPAM***
headers
So it seems to work through procmail without .forward. Does anyone know
why this might be?
Christopher Fogarty
Director of IT
cell. 412 726 3917
Ph. 412 232 3250 ex 216
> -Original Message---
I seem to be getting a *lot* of spam relayed via these guys recently.
Can others confirm this?
if it's the case, I'll come up with a forged-hostname test for it.
--j.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
htt
Rene Verharen said:
> Because of my manual maintained procmail filters are getting bigger and
> bigger I just wondered if I can setup Spamassassin on my virtual host.
>
> This host is running Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) PHP/4.2.2 FrontPage/4.0.4.3
> mod_ssl/2.8.10 OpenSSL/0.9.6e on Linux. I have no
Avi Schwartz said:
> Inquiring minds want to know...
>
> I recently started getting spammed by c0olmail.com. For some reason SA
> does not realize it is spam nor its seems that they come up as spammers
> in spamcop.net or rbl. What is the reason for that?
Cos nobody's (a) written a rule or (
Hi all,
A newbie question here :
Because of my manual maintained procmail filters are getting bigger and
bigger I just wondered if I can setup Spamassassin on my virtual host.
This host is running Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) PHP/4.2.2 FrontPage/4.0.4.3
mod_ssl/2.8.10 OpenSSL/0.9.6e on Linux. I have
12 matches
Mail list logo
