* Mike Burger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 21, 02 at 00:50:
> I have "X-Spam-Status" in every message that SA scans.
SA scanning is different than when Amavisd-new calls SA modules to spam
scan. Amavisd-new does not call all SA modules, such as adding the
X-Spam-Status header for all ema
Someone poisoning DSBL?
Sep 21 00:30:45 eclectic sendmail[13924]: g8L4Uim5013924: ruleset=check_rcpt,
arg1=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
relay=blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226], reject=550 5.7.1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Rejected:
207.69.200.226 listed as open relay; see http://www.dsbl.org/
S
Rob McMillin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whatever happened to the SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS test? It's no longer
> present in 2.41.
It seems to be right there (in the both 2.41 and the CVS tree).
Dan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGe
Aaahhh...oops...i'm not running through Amavis. Please ignore my last
reply.
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Mike Leone wrote:
> * Avi Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 20, 02 at 23:57:
> > Is SA supposed to always insert a X-Spam-Status tag?
> >
> > I just started using SA + Postfix + amav
I have "X-Spam-Status" in every message that SA scans.
On 20 Sep 2002, Avi Schwartz wrote:
> Is SA supposed to always insert a X-Spam-Status tag?
>
> I just started using SA + Postfix + amavisd-new and it seems to me that
> SA does not insert this tag into non-spam messages. Is this correct?
>
Sure...if you think that netsol, etc, is spamming you, you'll ignore the
useful info at the bottom...like "if you don't reply, we'll reject the
transfer request".
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Lars Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:40:31 -0700
> Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It
* Avi Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 20, 02 at 23:57:
> Is SA supposed to always insert a X-Spam-Status tag?
>
> I just started using SA + Postfix + amavisd-new and it seems to me that
> SA does not insert this tag into non-spam messages. Is this correct?
Correct. Amavisd-new on
[ I'm still seeking examples... ]
Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Huh?? What the? Did I read that right?
> They're /actively/ trying to get their own mails tagged as spam or ignored?
> That must be a new low.
It appears the goal is to be ignored. Tagged as spam, I'm not as sure.
ne
Is SA supposed to always insert a X-Spam-Status tag?
I just started using SA + Postfix + amavisd-new and it seems to me that
SA does not insert this tag into non-spam messages. Is this correct?
The reason I am asking is that I received few email messages that were
very obviously spam emails but
Hey Doug:
I forwarded the spamass-milter tarball to you, and my notes for
installing on Debian in a separate email. The debian notes won't do
much for you if you stick with BSD, as the debian packages take most of
the work out of it for you.
A few points of clarification for you:
I am not usi
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
> Bugtraq messages do not trigger FPs half as frequently as e.g.
> Lockergnome or ZDNet HTML newsletters.
Some might consider tagged ZDNet HTML newsletters to be TPs.
--
Theodore Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> West Lafayette, IN, USA
-
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:40:31 -0700
Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that some of these messages are being filtered as spam. In the
> case of networksolutions.com, it appears that they are putting the
> transfer request below a large amount of marketing material in an attempt
Thanks for the link Quentin
At first glance those articles refer to postfix rather than sendmail, but
hopefully the info is at least partly relevant to standard sendmail setups
- Original Message -
From: "Quentin Krengel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Quentin Krengel'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thanks for the response Quentin
I'd gained the impression from various documentation that it is possible in
theory to run spamassassin without procmail, but I've been finding both
procmail & spamassassin a considerable struggle due to the sparse
documentation. Appears the
majority of texts assume
[ Sorry for the cross-post, but my last request for examples (a fetchmail
problem) did not get any responses, so I think I will try both lists for
this one. ]
If you have received a domain transfer confirmation email from
networksolutions.com or register.com in the last 60 days, could you ple
>
> Have you noticed that spammers are trying to steer around the
> lots-of-spaces-in-subject rule by instead using a combination of spaces,
> underscores, and hyphens?
>
> Such cat and mouse games.
>
Yeah, I've noticed that.. and changing words like "remove" to "rem0ve" and
"unsubscribe" to "uns
Oh them. Pesky aren't they? I was really annoyed when they started to sneak
in with the single o version of their name (azogle). No, they don't forge
headers.
I just stuck them in my sendmail DISCARD access list and don't even bother with
checking further.
They're not the only one who often m
Whatever happened to the SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS test? It's no longer
present in 2.41.
--
Palladium: First they came for the Linux desktop users, but I said
nothing,
because I wasn't a Linux desktop user...
-- future prisoner in the Microsoft gulag
Here's a four-part series at securityfocus.com regarding installing SA
onto BSD.
This is the last article - has links to the first three at the bottom;
http://online.securityfocus.com/infocus/1611
Enjoy,
-
Quentin Krengel
Krengel Technology Inc
-
http://www.iks-jena.de/mitarb/lutz/usenet/teergrube.en.html
I call this kind of delay introduction a "spambump", like speedbumps used to
slow you down in a parking lot. It does not surprise me that someone else
has already though of it.
Basically it consist of sending a continuation instead of "
Hey Doug,
Place your fine-tuning in local.cf (normally found in /etc/spamassassin)
More information should be available regarding fine tuning in the main
page found at "man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf" on your system.
Quentin Krengel
Krengel Technology Inc
Here are a few notes from a recent pos
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 12:38:15PM -0700, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Jeremy Zawodny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hasn't stopped them from attemping to deliver roughly 4,000
> > messages per day--every day.
>
> How many could they send if traffic from their ip address to the SMTP port
> on your m
I don't consider myself highly experienced, and can put together my
newbie notes for getting SA going on Debian Linux if you want them. [It
is considerably easier on Debian because one just "apt-get install
spamassassin", reads the readme files that came with the Debian pack,
makes a few small tw
GANDI. www.gandi.net. "You own your domain name. Period. We just
act as your agent."
Since having been reccomended to them by a friend, I'll use nothing else.
--mec
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven
Jeremy Zawodny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hasn't stopped them from attemping to deliver roughly 4,000
> messages per day--every day.
How many could they send if traffic from their ip address to the SMTP port
on your mail server's ip address went to an SMTP tarpit instead of being
simply rejecte
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:36:18AM -0700, Chris Petersen wrote:
> azoogle.com should be added to the global "bad hosts" list. They don't
> seem to forge their headers, so a simple from/body check should handle it.
>
> and here they go, off to my server's blacklist.
Yeah, I've had them in the b
OK, I've made the AWL now gradually lower scores for a From/IP address
combo over time (in HEAD); I reckon this should be safe, now that we track
IPs and the forged-From thing is not a problem any more.
--j.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
At 11:45 AM 9/20/02 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:10:47PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> > OpenSRS 100% Recommended (2 reviews)
>
>I have a friend who's a reseller for them, so not surprisingly all of
>my domains are done through OpenSRS. No pro
I would like to suggest a change to the auto-whitelist function.
Currently, the AWL function can increase or decrease the score. However,
since SPAMMERS almost never use the same email address for different spam
runs, there is little to no value from increasing the spam score of an
email from
I just blacklisted the azoogle.com domain this morning as well.
Dan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
also azogle.com -- with just one o
eric
--
every passing minute is another
chance to turn it all around
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:36 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] "new" spam host
azoogle.com shou
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:10:47PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> networksolutions_com 0% Recommended (37 reviews)
Good, they should die. I'm glad they're not recommended. (I had
nothing but problems with them, as did everyone else I know of...)
Two thumbs down.
> Register_com
azoogle.com should be added to the global "bad hosts" list. They don't
seem to forge their headers, so a simple from/body check should handle it.
and here they go, off to my server's blacklist.
-Chris
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 01:40 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
> drat -- and I'd just gotten around to updating the downloads
> page on SpamAssassin.org to point to it! ;)
> get well soon, kluge.net...
>
heh heh heh. it's back online now. went out and bought myself a nice
dual athlon to r
Matt Kettler said:
> Bugtraq is particularly prone to being razored, as some people still have
> razor auto-reporting based on spamassassin scores enabled.
BTW, I can't be sure, but my theory is that the bugtraq-in-Razor thing is
not anything to do with SpamAssassin; more likely is that some s
Hello Folks..
Because I am a new to the world of Linux, I was wondering whether you
fine folks would be able to assist me some..
I have SA 2.31 ( yes, I know there is a newer version avaiable )
running, but I need to know some tricks of the trade to fine tuning
SA... Whether a specific file
Theo Van Dinter said:
> So if you've sent me mail wondering where the RPMs and such went,
> that's what is going on. Technology sucks. ;(
drat -- and I'd just gotten around to updating the downloads
page on SpamAssassin.org to point to it! ;)
get well soon, kluge.net...
--j.
-
37 matches
Mail list logo
