* Mike Burger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 21, 02 at 00:50: > I have "X-Spam-Status" in every message that SA scans.
SA scanning is different than when Amavisd-new calls SA modules to spam scan. Amavisd-new does not call all SA modules, such as adding the X-Spam-Status header for all emails; it only does that for spam emails. I think you're thinking that amavisd-new just executes the whole SA application; it does not; it executes certain SA perl subroutines. > > On 20 Sep 2002, Avi Schwartz wrote: > > > Is SA supposed to always insert a X-Spam-Status tag? > > > > I just started using SA + Postfix + amavisd-new and it seems to me that > > SA does not insert this tag into non-spam messages. Is this correct? > > > > The reason I am asking is that I received few email messages that were > > very obviously spam emails but where not caught as such and I want to > > know whether SA missed tme or whether amavisd-new did not pass the mail > > messages to SA for some reason. > > > > Thanks, > > Avi > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
