> I empathize with you...
> Do you have a README in /usr/share/doc/spamassassin?
No I don't thats the very first place I looked
> Have you checked out the doc's here?
> http://spamassassin.taint.org/doc.html
>
And that is the second place I looked no info that I could find
in answ
I empathize with you...
Do you have a README in /usr/share/doc/spamassassin?
Have you checked out the doc's here?
http://spamassassin.taint.org/doc.html
Quentin Krengel
Krengel Technology Inc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug
Young
If you:
1. tag your mail with spamassassin after retrieving it with fetchmail
or another POP3/IMAP program that adds Received headers long after
the mail has been sent
2. and the DATE_IN_PAST_* rules are incorrectly triggering for you on
nonspam
Then, please attach one recent nonspam e
> > Would someone please enlighten me on dependencies / pre-requisites
> > for installation in FreeBSD. The 'official' documentation isn't
particularly
> > explicit about this stuff eg 'procmail' is mentioned but without
saying
> > whether or not its essential, & no info provided on whether G
Does anyone have any idea how to approach this project?:
I have a large number of people who want spam protection
(and virus protection) for their email accounts. These
accounts are on numerous servers scattered across the globe.
The only access I have to these accounts is via POP, that
is, I
Hi,
I had a sort of conversation with Matt Stern, their VP, after spamming one
of my personal domains asking if I wanted to move.
I replied rather abruptly (slimey, bast*rd, etc were used) and he
personnally replied back asking what the problem was.
I then replied in a very business-like manner
On Thursday 19 September 2002 14:31, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
# Thought y'all'd be interested in their reply...
#
# -- Forwarded message --
# From: Jennifer Bogren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# To: 'Tony L. Svanstrom' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:18:35 -0700
# Subject:
Thought y'all'd be interested in their reply...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jennifer Bogren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'Tony L. Svanstrom' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:18:35 -0700
Subject: RE: eNom Inc. $6.95 Domain Pricing
Hi Tony,
We found you on Google.com. Y
Francesc, the best solution is to read the document that
describes this. Try this: man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
> I want that spamd don't scan emails send to some address, for example
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] I supose that I've to added in my
>conf spamassassin file (/etc/mail/spamassassin/loc
Francesc Guim Bernat wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want that spamd don't scan emails send to some address, for example
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] I supose that I've to added in my
> conf spamassassin file (/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf) the next line:
>
> whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
I had set ok_languages all in the local.cf file. My
main intention is to allow chinese encoding. By thisl, will it include
all chinese encoding like GB18030, GB2312, HZ and BIG5?
regards
Did you check to see if that file (/root/.razor/identity) exists? What are
the permissions?
Did you register as root (or did you do it as a non-root user, in which
case they have an identity but not the root user)?
At 12:18 PM 9/19/2002 +0200, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
>Hy there!
>I was wonderin
You shouldn't need to do anything, other than restart spamd if you're using
that.
Each time it starts Spamassassin checks for razor, and if you're using 2.40
or greater, it checks for razor 2 as well.
If you've manually zeroed out the RAZOR_CHECK score in your scores, you'll
have to put it ba
Yeah, that's the main reason why razor2 was designed with a submitter
rating system. This way the people that wind up auto-submitting mailing
lists and other non-spam get ignored. Razor1 has no built-in way of
recognizing "this guy submits a lot of non-spam, ignore him". The best you
can do is
Thanks for the pointer! I thought I had checked the FAQ, but it turns out I
had just checked the Razor FAQ, and the last time I read the SpamAssassin
FAQ that wasn't in there.
For some reason the Sourceforge mailing lists search only seems to support
searching messages from 8/6/02 and earlier,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:58:17AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > What I think is happening is that the .exe suffix is being added to the
> > binary (I'm assuming this is one of the executable files, and that extension
> > would be required for Cygwin use), but something
Hey folks,
Just wanted to send out a quick mail in case anyone was looking for me
or some files off my server (RPMs, etc,) at kluge.net. The hardware
decided to die yesterday morning/early afternoon (any or all of the
cpu, motherboard, and/or power supply has gotten mega-flaky). I
ordered r
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars
> Hansson
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 2:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA Results
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 08:48:46 +0200
> Pawel Wojnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Hi,
I have been seeing this problem too. I am running Spamassassin-2.30. Is
there a solution? I didn't see any responses to this question.
TIA,
Pete
Rich Puhek wrote:
>I've got a problem with whitelist_to, possibly just in my
>implementation.
>
>I have several all_spam_to entiries for users t
> "RGRB" == Ralf G R Bergs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RGRB> Is there a way to determine WHO did this and to stop them from
RGRB> adding more false positives?
This is, I believe, one of the major advantages to using Razor2. You
can't do what you are asking with Razor1.
---
> "TLS" == Tony L Svanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TLS> Would anyone care to share their thinking regarding doing
TLS> business with eNom? A quick google seems to indicate that
TLS> they're a really bad spamming company
They spammed me to sign up for their reseller program since I o
> "v" == vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
v> Some of my "Security Violations" and "Unusual System Events" are being
v> tagged as SPAM by SpamAssassin. How do I get SA to ignore these messages?
whitelists. you *really* have to white list any message source that
discusses or is used to re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> What I think is happening is that the .exe suffix is being added to the
> binary (I'm assuming this is one of the executable files, and that extension
> would be required for Cygwin use), but something then can't find the
> executable file as a result. This /usr/bin/perl
"Cari D. Burstein" said:
> I have no idea how to fix this problem and I can't find any references to
> it anywhere.
look harder. hint: it's the 2nd item in the FAQ on spamassassin.org.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welco
Miles Fidelman said:
> I've been running spamassassin 2.20, and been waiting to upgrade to 2.41
> until it seems stable. At this point, I've been seeing a lot fewer bug
> reports, and a variety of references to patches, but... I don't see either
> a patch directory or a 2.42, and all the develo
Hy there!
I was wondering why this message appears, after having installed and
registered my Razor...
t/razor2This test should have been skipped:
razor-register has not been run, or /root/.razor/identity is unreadable.
Thanx
Boniforti Flavio
Informa Srl
Via 42 Martiri, 1
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 08:48:46 +0200
Pawel Wojnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does SpamAssassin tag my spam messages about 22 times in the message's
> body?
hmm..mail loop?
Check the headers and see if it is indeed looping.
---
Lars Hansson
--
Hello!
I installed SpamAssassin, but AFTER installing it I wanted to install
Razor.
I installed Razor, but now I'd like SpamAssassin to recognize it and use
it, how do I do?
Thank you
Boniforti Flavio
Informa Srl
Via 42 Martiri, 165
28924 Verbania (VB)
Tel +39 0323 586216
Fax +39 0323 586672
htt
28 matches
Mail list logo
