On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 09:36:41PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
| | Rob> Now SPAM's getting through this "loop hole". Is there any way to
| | Rob> whitelist based upon Recipient to:, or am I just screwed?
| |
| | Can't you just define a "header" rule, such as
| |
| | header REALLY_ME
> Jim> I installed the i386.rpm version of Spam Assassin and thanks to
the
> Jim> help from everybody, I got it up and running - question is,
where's
> Jim> the rules file so that I can alter the percentages and such?
>
> Dunno, but you can list the files in an RPM with
>
> rpm -ql
Jim> I installed the i386.rpm version of Spam Assassin and thanks to the
Jim> help from everybody, I got it up and running - question is, where's
Jim> the rules file so that I can alter the percentages and such?
Dunno, but you can list the files in an RPM with
rpm -ql rpmname
o
I installed the i386.rpm version of Spam Assassin and thanks to the help
from everybody, I got it up and running - question is, where's the rules
file so that I can alter the percentages and such?
Thanks!
Jim Hale
---
Jim & Kathy's Website Collection
http://hale.dyndns.org
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 04:17:17PM -0500, Jim Hale wrote:
> I've decided that until I get comfortable with running SA as a system-wide
> util, I'm going to set it up for individuals on my EMail server (there's only 5
> so copying the files needed shouldn't be a big hassle) - anyway - is there a
I've decided that until I get comfortable with running SA as a system-wide
util, I'm going to set it up for individuals on my EMail server (there's only 5
so copying the files needed shouldn't be a big hassle) - anyway - is there a
way to link SA to process incoming messages to a mailing list a
Great! Thank you.
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 15:17, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 03:03:06PM -0500, Ken Causey wrote:
> > body IMAS_SCRIPT/imas.?script/i
> >
> > What's up with that? HTML comments are not searched?
>
> Try using rawbody instead. body trims out t
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 03:03:06PM -0500, Ken Causey wrote:
> body IMAS_SCRIPT/imas.?script/i
>
> What's up with that? HTML comments are not searched?
Try using rawbody instead. body trims out the cruft.
The 'raw body' of a message is the text, including all
I recently mentioned the occurrence of spams referring to something
called IMAS. In particular they are HTML emails and will include near
the beginning
OK. So I added the following the my local.cf:
body IMAS_SCRIPT/imas.?script/i
describe IMAS_SCRIPTTag indicating
| Rob> Now SPAM's getting through this "loop hole". Is there any way to
| Rob> whitelist based upon Recipient to:, or am I just screwed?
|
| Can't you just define a "header" rule, such as
|
| header REALLY_ME To =~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
| describe REALLY_ME To: indicates it's for m
I have just in the past week noticed a similar problem: some messages
get through with no trace of spamd looking at them.
I am running fetchmail-5.9.11, qmail-1.03, procmail-3.21 and
spamc/spamd-2.20 with razor-1.20, all on redhat 7.2/linux-2.4.7-10.
spamc/d works well, dumping perhaps 30 emails
These are global rules for the company mail server. I figured that any mail
sent internally would have the mail server IP listed, which would make an
excellent check rule. Then if anyone spoofs the FROM, the lack of the mail
server IP would prevent the whitelist exception.
-Rob
> -Origina
Rob> Now SPAM's getting through this "loop hole". Is there any way to
Rob> whitelist based upon Recipient to:, or am I just screwed?
Can't you just define a "header" rule, such as
header REALLY_ME To =~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
describe REALLY_ME To: indicates it's for me
score R
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 11:20, Joel Epstein wrote:
> Is there a way to set a size limit as to which mails are scanned?
Since you are using procmail you can simply add a test
* < 25
to the recipe that you use to call spamassassin.
By the way, I have a similar RedHat 6.2/sendmail/procmail setu
I have been using whitelist_from to prevent any work email addresses from
getting accidently marked as SPAM. It seemed to be working well until some
evil SOB started spoofing the FROM line, with my work domain address.
Now SPAM's getting through this "loop hole". Is there any way to whitelist
Tobias,
Thanks for your response. We only use spam assassin currently for 4
users on our system. I have not investigated the spamd daemon and
client as of yet.
Is there a way to set a size limit as to which mails are scanned?
That would be a perfect work-around for this. My sendmail has be
On Tue, 21 May 2002 the voices made Matt Sergeant write:
> Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> > The problem with that is, of course, that it messes up existing MIME...
> > meaning that people will bitch about not having the cake and eating it at the
> > same time, or sumthin like that. :-)
>
> It doesn
Kingsley G. Morse Jr. writes:
> Being an old AI/GA programmer who just started using
> SA, your post fascinates me. Thanks for the update on
> your research.
> [...]
> It seems to me that it would be interesting to consider a _summary_ of
>
> a.) The percentage of false positives and
>
This code:
if (!$triplets_loaded) {
my $filename = $self->{main}->{rules_filename} . "/triplets.txt";
if (!open (TRIPLETS, "<$filename")) {
dbg ("failed to open '$filename', cannot check dictionary");
return 1;
}
is giving me this output from spamd:
debug: checking
On 21-May-2002 at 15:23:56 Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2002, John Horne wrote:
>> I guess the question should be should 'make test' ignore any
>> pre-installed configuration file? Is this mentioned anywhere in the
> docs? If it is then I missed it.
>
> See bugzilla.spamassassin.org #207
While RFC2045 says that the boundary parameter of the header
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; can be quoted or not,
spamassassin seems to treat them differently, in particular
it seem not to consider an unquoted boundary parameter as MIME.
rfc2045:
>Note that the value of a quoted string par
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 09:10:06AM -0700, Scott Nelson wrote:
> I see something in SA 2.20;
> uri HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST /^https?\:\/\/[^\/]*%/
> describe HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST Uses %-escapes inside a URL's hostname
> score HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST 1.849
>
> I think ESCAPES_DIGIT /%3[0-9]
On Tue, 21 May 2002, John Horne wrote:
> I guess the question should be should 'make test' ignore any pre-installed
> configuration file? Is this mentioned anywhere in the docs? If it is then I
> missed it.
See bugzilla.spamassassin.org #207 ...
On 20-May-2002 at 16:21:47 John Horne wrote:
> On 20-May-2002 at 10:59:00 John Horne wrote:
> Damn! Spoke too soon when I reported that this was sorted on the solaris 7
> system. I've just installed perl 5.6.1 with no problems onto one of the
> mailhubs (solaris 8); rebuilt spamassassin and I stil
John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
> Hi --
>
> I reinstalled SA 2.20 after running and then having to disable an earlier
> version some time ago. The new version doesn't seem to be catching as many
> spams as the old one, and as I was perusing the report on those it did
> find, I was surprised at some o
Hi --
I reinstalled SA 2.20 after running and then having to disable an earlier
version some time ago. The new version doesn't seem to be catching as many
spams as the old one, and as I was perusing the report on those it did
find, I was surprised at some of the negative scores I saw assigned to
hi,
On Tue, 21 May 2002 08:50:57 -0500, Joel Epstein wrote:
JE> I've been using Spam Assassin for a few months now and find it to be
JE> a fantastic project. My thanks go out to the team!
JE>
JE> I do have one major issue though; Whenever files with large
JE> attachments ( > 4mb )are sent into
I need to get try and get this running on my personal EMail server (home-based)
that has several accounts on it. I'm using Postfix (not sendmail, but I do have
a sendmail.postfix executable to work with.) - Are there instructions for
setting up SA with Postfix and also the ability for people to
I've been using Spam Assassin for a few months now and find it to be a
fantastic project. My thanks go out to the team!
I do have one major issue though; Whenever files with large
attachments ( > 4mb )are sent into our domain, SpamAssassin will take
about 45% of available memory and 98% of th
Daniel,
Being an old AI/GA programmer who just started using
SA, your post fascinates me. Thanks for the update on
your research.
On Mon:22:07, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
[...]
> My only gripe is that having so many rules is somewhat clumsy in the
> scores file, even using arguments. What if spamass
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2002 the voices made Matt Sergeant write:
>
>
>>Daniel Quinlan wrote:
>>
>>>Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Yeah, I've got that working here. It's a pretty trivial change to
SpamAssassin, but I haven't gotten around to integ
On Tue, 21 May 2002 the voices made Matt Sergeant write:
> Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> > Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Yeah, I've got that working here. It's a pretty trivial change to
> >>SpamAssassin, but I haven't gotten around to integrating it yet. It's
> >>just a matter
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Yeah, I've got that working here. It's a pretty trivial change to
>>SpamAssassin, but I haven't gotten around to integrating it yet. It's
>>just a matter of setting the content-type to multipart/mixed, and set
>>the first
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Matt Sergeant writes:
>
>
>>Every single one of these is a virus, not spam.
>
>
> I think it's a worm, actually
Call it what you like. It's still malicious code designed purely to
propogate (and perhaps do something evil while it does so). In no way is
it unsolicited
34 matches
Mail list logo
