Ok so...
I progressed.
Pulling spamc from the /etc/procmailrc and placing it into the various
/usr/home/user/.procmailrc accounts works.
This is not that bad as I only have a dozen email address to cover here.
there must be a way to place spamc in the /etc/procmailrc account for
system wid
My test set is 1789 messages composed of about 25% spam. Only a few
possible tests in this set, but I figure it's good to share some of
the failures too.
1. Subject =~ /^\s*Re:/i
lacking "In-Reply-To" or "References" header
(idea for test from
http://linuxconf.unixtech.be/configuration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 09 May 2002 07:41 am, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Sorry, bad subject, couldn't think of better though ...
>
> Using postfix as an MTA, you can easily setup a
> content_filter so that all email through gets checked ...
> not a problem there .
I use qmail, and i recently install spamassasin,i download the tar.gz and
afeter that i do a perl makefile, make and make install.
Now i run the spamd and put the client in .qmail-user, but my question
is.. spamd takes the conf from (usr/share/spamassassin?or from
/etc/mail/spamassassin
So I have been using Spamassassin from procmail for my own personal
server for a while.
This is fine as I get 40 emails a day through it. Just using:
:0fw
| spamassassin -P -S -a
In the procmailrc file for site wide mail handling.
I have decided to try using spamass milter and spamd spamc.
So I have been using Spamassassin from procmail for my own personal
server for a while.
This is fine as I get 40 emails a day through it. Just using:
:0fw
| spamassassin -P -S -a
In the procmailrc file for site wide mail handling.
I have decided to try using spamass milter and spamd spamc.
Craig R Hughes wrote:
> representative of a wide enough range of spam. I'm going to do a test against
> part of the corpus soon though, so that'll give better numbers.
Would it be possible to include the script you use for performance testing
against a set of mails in the tools/ directory? This
Rob Reid wrote:
> prevent this from happening again, and how to edit out the existing infection?
> Can emacs safely edit db files?
$ echo 'From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' | spamassassin -R
This mostly works for me. So far I had one exception where I cannot remove
one address. check_whitelist even sh
>I would like a blacklist_to also, but I'd prefer that it simply added 6
>points to the score (the opposite of whitelist-to). Since whitelisting
>doesn't turn SA off, there's no sense in a blacklist turning it on.
At this point, if I don't stop SA being a resource hog, I can't offer SA to
my user
> Hi,
>
> Forward as attachment to a spam address (ie [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and use
> formail to strip out the attachment and report it.
AFAIK, the crappy software STILL modifies the orignal email...
I would be happy to be proved wrong though. My personal solution is to add a
x-Razor-SHA1 header, a
> Looking in the configuration options, I see:
>
> whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> which says that all the mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be whitelisted
> - no spam
> will be sent (I still don't understand the more_spam_to and all_spam_to
> stuff, but hey).
Actually it doesn't really mean th
> Outlook Express has a "Bounce" option in the right click menu. Outlook
> (the one that comes with Office) doesn't though.
In most versions of outlook, try Actions | Resend this Message after opening
a message. I don't know if it's a true "bounce" but it looks like it. I
don't know why this is m
Title: Port to Outlook 2000 client?
I'd like to do it client side filtering with Outlook 2000. I can extract messages from the client using Win32::OLE. Is it possible to install spamassassin under windoze via PPM and then pass it messages extracted from the Outlook client for testing?
Result is: 3 mx entries found!
And egrep VERSION /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Net/DNS.pm
$VERSION
$VERSION = "0.14";
sub version { $VERSION; }
Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone:/mobile: +49 172 2650958
fax: +49 1212 512
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:03:22PM +0200, Nipper, Arnold wrote:
> dig just times out if no nameserver is given in resolv.conf
Not surprising. No nameserver means no configuration, so what is dig
supposed to do?
But you had a nameserver line in there, and could check for MX using
dig, corre
On Thu, 09 May 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 May 2002, Simon Lyall wrote:
>>
>>>Does this sound like the sort of performace level other people are
>>>seeing, I'm just specing out how many servers we need to handle the
>>>load.
>> Nope. My system is a single proces
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:06:21AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> > It does not trigger NO_MX_FOR_FROM for me. Maybe there was some
transient DNS
> > issue?
>
> He was saying that it's triggered on every email even though the from
> has a valid MX found via some DNS tool
dig just times out if no nameserver is given in resolv.conf
(gateway:etc 44 )dig altaserv.net mx
; <<>> DiG 9.1.3 <<>> altaserv.net mx
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email:
»Sidney Markowitz« sagte am 2002-05-09 um 11:57:45 -0700 :
> Ok, let's try again without the corruption. It appears you missed the
> later line in which I said how to fix the problem, so I'll start with
> that:
Thanks!
> Add the option '-F 0' to the call to spamd or spamassassin, whichever
> you
»dman« sagte am 2002-05-09 um 10:55:46 -0500 :
> What's the POP box look like? mbox? maildir? Which POP server?
mbox. cppop from cpanel.
> Yes, that's what the message had. Do you have a shell on the mail
Yes, I do.
> server? Can you open the (presumably mbox) folder with your editor
I'
20 matches
Mail list logo
