Re: [SAtalk] Automatic Handling of SpamTraps

2002-04-26 Thread Craig R Hughes
Have fetchmail invoke procmail, and feed procmail the recipe: :0fw |spamassassin -L -P :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes /path/to/SPAM1 :0fw |spamassassin -P :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes /path/to/SPAM2 :0 { :0w |spamassassin -r :0: /path/to/SPAM3 } Richie Laager wrote: RL> -BEGIN PGP SIGN

[SAtalk] Automatic Handling of SpamTraps

2002-04-26 Thread Richie Laager
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've got a spamtrap address setup. I've gotten a good routine down: 1. Pipe the message through "spamassassin -L -P' 2. If spam, file in folder "SPAM1" 3. Pipe the message through "spamassassin -P" 4. If spam, file in folder "SPAM2" 5. If left, pipe

Re: [SAtalk] Add NJABL DNSBL to SA

2002-04-26 Thread rODbegbie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I currently use SpamCop, OsiruSoft, and NJABL for RBL on my Postfix > implementation. How can I add NJABL to SA? I have the following lines in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file: header RCVD_IN_NJABLeval:check_rbl('relay', 'dnsbl.njabl.org') describe

[SAtalk] THANKS [was: simple question, I hope]

2002-04-26 Thread Miles Fidelman
Ed and Bart, Thanks for your suggestions. By putting them together, and adding one item (see below), I solved my problem. Thanks! Miles > > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Hen

[SAtalk] Add NJABL DNSBL to SA

2002-04-26 Thread Dan . Smart
I currently use SpamCop, OsiruSoft, and NJABL for RBL on my Postfix implementation. How can I add NJABL to SA? BTW: Here are my DNSBL stats. Often, njabl is #1 Dalton DNSBL Hit Comparison Statistics Fri Apr 26 14:04:36 2002 KEY: 0: relays.osirusoft.com128/214 = 60% 1: d

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin with Qmail

2002-04-26 Thread AHYDLE
Title: Message To tell you the truth I like the idea of just stamping the message and allowing the user to filter it. But I know how my boss is and if I cannot get this way to work, he will want to look at other products. The plan is to redirect to a mail address that ends in a public folder

Re: [SAtalk] FAIL SpamAssassin 2.20 on Solaris 8 perl 5.6.1

2002-04-26 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Thurn, Martin (Intranet) wrote: > t/spamd.ld.so.1: ../spamd/spamc: fatal: relocation > error: file ../spamd/spamc: symbol __register_frame_info: referenced > symbol not found Your $PATH is messed up -- you're mixing native linker with GNU compiler or vice-ver

Re: [SAtalk] FAIL SpamAssassin 2.20 on Solaris 8 perl 5.6.1

2002-04-26 Thread Craig R Hughes
Thurn, Martin (Intranet) wrote: TMI> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed TMI> --- TMI> t/razor.t21 50.00% 1 No idea why that's failing -- might h

[SAtalk] FAIL SpamAssassin 2.20 on Solaris 8 perl 5.6.1

2002-04-26 Thread Thurn, Martin (Intranet)
Hi I tried to build & test SpamAssassin 2.20 on Solaris with perl 5.6.1 and gcc 3.0.4 (using the CPAN shell) I already have 2.01 installed and it works great (Thank you!) = = = = = = = = = = = = = = PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/local/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib -I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/sun4

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin with Qmail

2002-04-26 Thread James Bly
Title: Message You could definitely do it. In fact you could do it in at least 10 different ways. The question is merely where you want to send the data and you'll have to get a little background in perl, and mail agents to pull it off. (I decided in my most recent config like this, to just

RE: [SAtalk] simple question, I hope

2002-04-26 Thread Miles Fidelman
Ed, On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote: > Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:58:30 -0400 > From: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Miles Fidelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Spam Assassin List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject:

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin with Qmail

2002-04-26 Thread AHYDLE
Title: RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin with Qmail Do you think this would work if I was using qmail as a relay? It don't think it delivers locally or reads the .qmail files if there is the relay set up in smtproutes. But maybe it could give me some ideas. I just really need this to work, this is pri

RE: [SAtalk] simple question, I hope

2002-04-26 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote: > > > > > > > :0 fw > > > > |spamassassin -d > > > > > > > > :0: > > > > $MAIL > > > > > > how are you suggesting that I actually use these? >

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassing performance and memory usage

2002-04-26 Thread Craig R Hughes
Matt Sergeant wrote: MS> Well personally I'd rather see the test harness code improved to time regexps MS> too, and alert of slow ones. However that requires a lot more work on the MS> behalf of the developers who have so far completely ignored the test MS> framework I wrote. I've implemented so

Re: [SAtalk] What's an easy way to report the spam I get?

2002-04-26 Thread Brian Kendig
> Now, when you access spamcop.net after > submitting spams via email, there's a "Report Now" link which > allows you to > work your way through all the spam you've submitted. So you don't > have to > click all the links in the mails. Thank you for the tip! But I'm having trouble figuring out

RE: [SAtalk] simple question, I hope

2002-04-26 Thread Miles Fidelman
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote: > > > > > :0 fw > > > |spamassassin -d > > > > > > :0: > > > $MAIL > > > > how are you suggesting that I actually use these? > > How do you want to u

RE: [SAtalk] simple question, I hope

2002-04-26 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote: > > > :0 fw > > |spamassassin -d > > > > :0: > > $MAIL > > how are you suggesting that I actually use these? How do you want to use them? You've never explained -when- you want to remove the

RE: [SAtalk] simple question, I hope

2002-04-26 Thread Miles Fidelman
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote: > > The two obvious approaches seem to have problems: > > > > |spamassassin -d |mail $MAIL -- spamassassin will simply reprocess the > > message, and, in any case, the original headers won't show up properly > > > > |spamassassin -d >>$MAIL

RE: [SAtalk] Text as images

2002-04-26 Thread James Bly
That or someone could always write an OCR module for perl. Wow I'm sure that'd be a joyride. Any bored college students out there looking for a good c/sci project? It could also potentially be linked with an external program like GOCR or another GNU OCR program. If anyone is curious on digging i

RE: [SAtalk] who's using SpamAssassin for all virtuals in Qmail/Vpopmail?

2002-04-26 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > I believe the new version of SA allows userprefs in vpopmail directories.. > although I have not had the time to play with it. I dont see how it could > be faster to parse a userpref file than do a database query > anyhow.. I think > i'll stick with my current setup. > > Dallas > I'm the on

Re: [SAtalk] who's using SpamAssassin for all virtuals in Qmail/Vpopmail?

2002-04-26 Thread Dallas Engelken
- Original Message - From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 4. Here is a sample .mailfilter file: Refer to my post about adding exit calls to keep messages from deferring. > to turn it on/off. Of course this approach requires a perl script that > users can use to m

RE: [SAtalk] who's using SpamAssassin for all virtuals in Qmail/Vpopmail?

2002-04-26 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > It has also got an issue with not bouncing spam to non existing > addresses > > there needs to be a check as to what > VHOME=`/var/vpopmail/pop/bin/vuserinfo > > -d $EXT@$HOST` actually comes to... when it says "no such user" then it > > ought to bounce rather than trying to put it in a maild

RE: [SAtalk] who's using SpamAssassin for all virtuals in Qmail/Vpopmail?

2002-04-26 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > Anyone else here trying to use SpamAssassin to filter > ALL incoming mail for many users in Vpopmail on Qmail? > > Is Qmail-Scanner the way to go? http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/ > ifspamh? http://www.gbnet.net/~jrg/qmail/ifspamh > > Any tips/URLs/FAQs appreciated. > I'm pret

Re: [SAtalk] who's using SpamAssassin for all virtuals in Qmail/Vpopmail?

2002-04-26 Thread Dallas Engelken
- Original Message - From: "Gregor Lawatscheck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:14 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] who's using SpamAssassin for all virtuals in Qmail/Vpopmail? > At 06:35 26/04/2002, you wrote: > >Is Qmail-Scanner the way to go? http:

Re: [SAtalk] who's using SpamAssassin for all virtuals in Qmail/Vpopmail?

2002-04-26 Thread Gregor Lawatscheck
At 06:35 26/04/2002, you wrote: >Is Qmail-Scanner the way to go? http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/ >ifspamh? http://www.gbnet.net/~jrg/qmail/ifspamh > >Any tips/URLs/FAQs appreciated. >I'm pretty new to it, on the brink of understanding, >but could use any pointers from people who'

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassing performance and memory usage

2002-04-26 Thread Matt Sergeant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 25 Apr 2002 6:34 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote: > Matt Sergeant wrote: > > MS> Now that's interesting. I wonder if it's constructed specifically to > make SA MS> hang... I guess we need to redo the body test parser to grep > out blank lines. MS