Re: [SAtalk] Implementing Razor

2002-04-06 Thread Ed Kasky
Kenneth - I have razor compiled and working. I just want to be sure that it passes the mail to the recipient even if it reaches the set threshold. Right now I have it set so this way so that each user on the system can be sure that nothing got tagged by mistake before deleting. I want to be

Re: [SAtalk] Implementing Razor

2002-04-06 Thread Kenneth Chen
Ed: I believe SpamAssassin is capable of running razor on its own when Razor properly compiled and working. It's part of the many tests it uses. My spamc automatically throws each email against razor's database, and gives it some extra points when it sees that it is in the database. So yes, ma

Re: [SAtalk] Implementing Razor

2002-04-06 Thread Ed Kasky
I read the faq at spamAssasin.org which answered the question as to what to do with mail already received using the script. Can the razor check, etc. be automatic using spamassassin as it can be with spamd/spamc? How do most folks run it? Daemon or command line? And lastly, does a "razored"

Re: [SAtalk] sendmail & SA - Newbie Questions

2002-04-06 Thread Chris Beggy
From: "Joe Nave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi, > > First of all thanks for SA...I can't wait for the Spam to stop. :) > > I am running sendmail 8.12.2 on a FreeBSD 4.4 machine and would like to > implement SA. I installed SA without any problems. I read about > spamc/spamd but am a little confuse

[SAtalk] Re: Interesting obfuscation was: [Snort-users] Subliminal html inspam? (fwd)

2002-04-06 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Shane Williams wrote: > I sent this to sightings as well, but thought it was interesting > enough to pass along to the main list as well. Never mind that the > guy who caught it was being a little paranoid, it's still an > interesting look at what spammers are doing to avoid d

[SAtalk] Interesting obfuscation was: [Snort-users] Subliminal html in spam?(fwd)

2002-04-06 Thread Shane Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I sent this to sightings as well, but thought it was interesting enough to pass along to the main list as well. Never mind that the guy who caught it was being a little paranoid, it's still an interesting look at what spammers are doing to avoid detection. Is

[SAtalk] sendmail & SA - Newbie Questions

2002-04-06 Thread Joe Nave
Hi, First of all thanks for SA...I can't wait for the Spam to stop. :) I am running sendmail 8.12.2 on a FreeBSD 4.4 machine and would like to implement SA. I installed SA without any problems. I read about spamc/spamd but am a little confused on how to integrate it with sendmail for SA to che

Re: [SAtalk] "Broken CGI script message" specifics?

2002-04-06 Thread Charlie Watts
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Lars Hansson wrote: > On Wed, 03 Apr 2002 23:40:27 -0800 > "Rob McMillin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > body BUGGY_CGI/Below is the result of your feedback form/ > > Well, this is certainly misleading if you use a fixed FormMail, like the one from > London Perl

[SAtalk] [Fwd: IP: more on ATTBI / Eudora / SSL]

2002-04-06 Thread Rob McMillin
Wonder if the open relay guys have caught on to this one yet. Sounds like false alarms aplenty if you rely exclusively on them for spam trapping (hee). Original Message Subject: IP: more on ATTBI / Eudora / SSL Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 14:18:57 -0500 From: Dave Farber <[EMAIL

[SAtalk] problem solved

2002-04-06 Thread Miles Fidelman
On 6 Apr 2002, Nils Vogels wrote: > On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 00:44, Miles Fidelman wrote: > > Maybe somebody can help me with the following: > > > > - I've just installed spamassassin 2.11 on my machine (Sun, Solaris) > > - it works from the command line > > - it works as a filter when I pipe from w

Re: [SAtalk] problem getting spamassassin working with procmail

2002-04-06 Thread Nils Vogels
Hey Miles, On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 00:44, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Maybe somebody can help me with the following: > > - I've just installed spamassassin 2.11 on my machine (Sun, Solaris) > - it works from the command line > - it works as a filter when I pipe from within Pine > - but,

Re: [SAtalk] spam-assassin & procmail

2002-04-06 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
On 6 Apr 2002 the voices made Craig Hughes write: > On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 05:21, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > > Easier... h... I dunno, I think most people would find any working non > > CVS-solution easier than having to panic while trying to figure out what the > > heck CVS is. :-) > Well,

Re: [SAtalk] Hi, I am the SpamAssassin maintainer

2002-04-06 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:54:34PM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote: > between something correctly configured (as an analog, take gasoline in > your car's tank) and assigns it the same value as the same thing > incorrectly configured (say, a Molotov cocktail). Sure, SA's not Just to nitpick -- both a

Re: [SAtalk] Implementing Razor

2002-04-06 Thread Craig Hughes
Install SA, install Razor, then run spamd without the -L flag and it'll use Razor. Read the FAQ first though on the website. C On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 08:27, ed wrote: > I am curious about how others on the list have implemented Razor in their > email systems along with SA... > > I have a fairly

Re: [SAtalk] spam-assassin & procmail

2002-04-06 Thread Craig Hughes
Well, ETA for 2.2 is ASAP, so soon you won't have to know what CVS is to get this stuff. C On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 05:21, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > Easier... h... I dunno, I think most people would find any working non > CVS-solution easier than having to panic while trying to figure out wha

[SAtalk] Implementing Razor

2002-04-06 Thread ed
I am curious about how others on the list have implemented Razor in their email systems along with SA... I have a fairly new installation of SA and have been toying with various settings for required hits, etc for the past few weeks and am almost ready to use it system wide. I have been readin

Re: [SAtalk] s-a not finding razor

2002-04-06 Thread Chris Beggy
From: Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The FAQ contains a clue about this problem. Oops. I don't know how I missed it... Thanks. Chris ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassi

Re: [SAtalk] spam-assassin & procmail

2002-04-06 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002 the voices made Robert Fleming write: > --On Friday, April 5, 2002 6:49 PM +0200 "Tony L. Svanstrom" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumoured to have written: > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 the voices made Chris MacLeod write: > > > >> I want to do something along the lines of dropping ever