On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 09:53 PM, Michael Moncur wrote:
> Of course, I'm also imagining
> someone else doing all of the work. :)
>
That happens to me a lot too, normally I'm lying in a hammoc under a
palm tree with a fruity drink in my hand, and scantily clad women
dancing all around.
I think I'll use * anyway -- then users can create filters to remove
"5-star spam"
C
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 05:18 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
>> Nice feature! I'll add this to SA itself.
>
> *grin* Please use something other than '*', though; it
Ok, I just patched spamd (not yet in CVS but will be in minutes) to log
some extra info -- now it'll dump not just whether each message is spam,
but also the score and threshold. It should henceforth be trivial to
just parse the log files to extract how messages were scored, even
broken down
I've just run about 1900 recent (last 5 months) spam messages through SA
(the CPAN version, if that matters) and it got about an 88% success rate.
(I had an old unfiltered email account from which I grabbed the spool.)
A few of those it missed are extremely obvious spams, containing e.g.:
> Subj
> In your personal .spamassassin.prefs, place something like this:
> Business User: Yes
> Pornographer: Yes
> Anti-Hotmail: Yes
> ...
> etc
>
> and have these kinds of group modifications tone down the scores
> of specific
> types of tests (in this case, anything mentioning money or having
> $ in
Ok, I've changed some char[] declarations to unsigned char[]; gcc gives
me no warnings with -Wall, but I'm not sure that doesn't mean it's all
fine now.
Also, thanks a lot for the per-user install instructions -- I've added
them to the README.
C
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 12:54, Erik B. Berry wrote:
I'll get our CGI guy to do this for our domain but I am wondering if this
would be something which might be of use to enough SA users to put into SA
itself:
In your personal .spamassassin.prefs, place something like this:
Business User: Yes
Pornographer: Yes
Anti-Hotmail: Yes
...
etc
and have