Morning all ...
Just got Spamaassasin installed on one of my servers, and it works
pretty good for several messages and then it appeasr that the
spamass-milter program, used to talk between sendmail and spamc, just
"dies" ... process stays running, but it hangs there not doing anything
.
On 09 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Note that spamproxyd is not nearly as featureful as spamc/spamd -- in
> particular, it will process *all* messages, including very long ones,
> which can suck up a lot of CPU and open your mail server to denial of
> service attacks. If anyone has got a postfix
* Craig Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-02-09T10:02-0800]:
> If you want to use this approach, then faster and more efficient
> would be to use the -c flag to spamc:
>
> cat $MSG | spamc -c && echo 'was spam' || echo 'was not spam'
<$MSG spamc -c && echo 'was spam' || echo 'was not spam'
Only *
If you want to use this approach, then faster and more efficient would
be to use the -c flag to spamc:
cat $MSG | spamc -c && echo 'was spam' || echo 'was not spam'
C
On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 07:45, dman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 01:48:01AM -0800, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
> | I'd l
You can do this quite easily. If your mailbox is berkeley-format:
cat mbox | formail -ds spamc -f -F1 > mbox.processed
No need to add features to spamassassin to do this :)
C
On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 01:48, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
> I'd like to test out spamassassin on a bunch of e-mail.
On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 15:43, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> It's not reliable enough in the face of:
>
> * NAT
> * Any MTA that fails to insert a received line.
> * fetchmail
Also multi-homed email servers. They might receive mail on one
interface and send it on over the other interface.
C
_
I was making things up. People really shouldn't listen to me, I'm wrong
about 50% of the time ...
It really shouldn't be hard to do ... but I'm not using SQL ...
On 9 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Is that a SQLBasedAddrList class or something? It's not in the
> distro... If someone has writ
Is that a SQLBasedAddrList class or something? It's not in the
distro... If someone has written one I'd happily roll it in.
C
On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 13:37, Charlie Watts wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Donald Greer wrote:
>
> >Ok, since this has been a _very_ unpopular suggestion :^), how abo
Note that spamproxyd is not nearly as featureful as spamc/spamd -- in
particular, it will process *all* messages, including very long ones,
which can suck up a lot of CPU and open your mail server to denial of
service attacks. If anyone has got a postfix master.cf line for
invoking spamc as a fil
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 01:48:01AM -0800, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote:
| I'd like to test out spamassassin on a bunch of e-mail. But there
| doesn't seem to be any way to automate such things with any detail.
Could you just stick some spam messages in one dir and non-spam in
another and have
I'd like to test out spamassassin on a bunch of e-mail. But there
doesn't seem to be any way to automate such things with any detail. If
I use the testing mode, there is no easy way to separate the testing
output from the normal stuff that is added to a spam message. Using -d
removes all markup
11 matches
Mail list logo
