At Sun, 7 Feb 2021 09:22:39 +,
nia wrote:
> > > -It is called at any time.
> > > +It can be called at any time.
> >
> > The later sounds to me "You(developer of MD driver) can call
> > it at any time". If so, it's incorrect.
>
> Maybe "it can be called by the MI layer at any time" is clearer
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 12:43:40PM +0900, Tetsuya Isaki wrote:
> > @@ -175,9 +175,9 @@
> > .Vt audio_format_t
> > structure according to given number
> > .Va afp->index .
> > -If there is no format with given number, return
> > +If there is no format with the given number, return
> > .Er EINVAL
Hello,
At Sat, 6 Feb 2021 13:55:40 +,
Nia Alarie wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: nia
> Date: Sat Feb 6 13:55:40 UTC 2021
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: audio.9
>
> Log Message:
> Fix various typos, etc
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdif
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 08:57:44AM +, matthew green wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: mrg
> Date: Sun Feb 23 08:57:44 UTC 2020
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: Makefile
>
> Log Message:
> install rw_lock_op link too.
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
>
On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 12:22:19 +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: atomic_loadstore.9
>
> Log Message:
> Simplify macro usage.
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 src/share/man/man9/atomic_loadstore.9
This breaks formatt
- pci_intr_setattr() is in pci_intr(9)
Sorry it should be pci_intr_disestablish(), not pci_intr_setattr()...
rin
On 2018/09/20 16:08, Rin Okuyama wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: rin
Date: Thu Sep 20 07:08:00 UTC 2018
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man9: pci.9
Log
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 03:52:01PM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: mutex.9
>
> Log Message:
> Specify memory ordering implied by mutex_(spin_)enter/exit.
>
> I'm hesitant to just say `implies membar_enter/exit' -- that may be a
> little stronge
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 18:40:19 +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 04:53:17PM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:53:00 +, Maya Rashish wrote:
> > > Modified Files:
> > > src/share/man/man9: byteorder.9
> > >
> > > Log Message:
> > > Suggest to in
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 04:53:17PM +0300, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:53:00 +, Maya Rashish wrote:
> > Modified Files:
> > src/share/man/man9: byteorder.9
> >
> > Log Message:
> > Suggest to include the POSIX rather than BSD
>
> Section 9 is kernel internals, so
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:53:00 +, Maya Rashish wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: byteorder.9
>
> Log Message:
> Suggest to include the POSIX rather than BSD
Section 9 is kernel internals, so is the correct header.
Please revert.
-uwe
Hi,
On 2016/07/06 18:20, Abhinav Upadhyay wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: abhinav
> Date: Wed Jul 6 09:20:42 UTC 2016
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: interrupt_distribute.9
>
> Log Message:
> Add missing .Nd
>
> ok wiz@, knakaraha@
>
>
> To generate a diff
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:14:08 +0200
From: Thomas Klausner
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 02:09:14PM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: riastradh
> Date: Mon Apr 20 14:09:14 UTC 2015
>
> Modified Files:
>src/share/m
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 02:09:14PM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: riastradh
> Date: Mon Apr 20 14:09:14 UTC 2015
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: vnode.9
>
> Log Message:
> Use Dv, not Li, for EBUSY/ENOENT.
Actually, there even is a sep
Le 27/12/2014 21:45, Thomas Klausner a écrit :
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: wiz
> Date: Sat Dec 27 20:45:08 UTC 2014
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: malloc.9
>
> Log Message:
> New sentence, new line. Bump date for previous.
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 08:38:29AM +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: vnodeops.9
>
> Log Message:
> New sentence, new line. Punctuation formatting nits.
Woops, sorry about that.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:16:36PM +, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: vnodeops.9
>
> Log Message:
> Update _PC_NO_TRUNC description to add the returned value, and
> replace non-existant KERN_NAME_MAX with {NAME_MAX}.
It is not nonexistent, it's KERNEL_NA
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 01:01:39PM +, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: vfsops.9
>
> Log Message:
> Fix copyin/copyout sections in xrefs.
Ugh, sorry about that. Should definitely not have let that get through...
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> >
> > Log Message:
> > Fix .Xr to membar_ops(3), not membar(9). Spotted by wiz@.
>
> Can you brief on what is the difference between membar_ops(3) and mb(9)?
>
mb(9) predates membar_ops(3). I do not know why it was left when the
later interface was added. It seems to
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 12:29:24PM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: rmind
> Date: Sun Aug 7 12:29:24 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: pserialize.9
>
> Log Message:
> Fix .Xr to membar_ops(3), not membar(9). Spotted by wiz@
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:46:48PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> - add some random notes
>
> Basically, KASSERT() should be used for light-weight checks and
> KDASSERT() should be used for heavier ones.
>
> Callers should not rely on the side effects of expression because,
>
Sorry, I was confused KASSERT(9) with DIAGNOSTICS.
(Don't send email before having coffee...)
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:30:18AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> hi,
>
> > How about ABI? KASSERT(9) should preserve ABI IMO.
>
> sorry, i'm not sure what you mean. can you explain?
>
> YAMAMOTO
hi,
> How about ABI? KASSERT(9) should preserve ABI IMO.
sorry, i'm not sure what you mean. can you explain?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
How about ABI? KASSERT(9) should preserve ABI IMO.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:46:48PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: yamt
> Date: Tue Jan 25 23:46:48 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: KASSERT.9
>
> Log Message:
> - add some rand
Hello,
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: jruoho
> Date: Fri May 14 18:52:46 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: bus_dma.9 kmem.9 pmc.9 sysctl.9 xcall.9
>
> Log Message:
> Use standard section headers.
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -
> >> to handle PCI bus master devices that (via DMA) transfer word parameters
> >> in little endian even on big endian systems.
>
> Still sounds pretty awkward.
Well, the definition of endianness itself is always awkward.
> What about "little endian control data" instead of juts "little endi
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:51:46PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > A transfer of little-endian data? I guess that's not entirely clear,
> > especially for anyone who doesn't automatically interpret "DMA" as "a
> > form of memcpy".
> >
> > Anyway, I just fixed it up again, please take a look.
> > >> -bus master devices which assumed little endian byte order in
> > >> +bus master devices that do little endian
> > >> .Tn DMA
> > >> -transfers, even on big endian systems.
> > >> +transfers on big endian systems.
> >
> > What's "little endian transfer"?
>
> A transfer of little-en
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 08:27:05PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> >> -bus master devices which assumed little endian byte order in
> >> +bus master devices that do little endian
> >> .Tn DMA
> >> -transfers, even on big endian systems.
> >> +transfers on big endian systems.
>
> What's "litt
> +The functions were originally introduced to handle
> +.Tn PCI
> +bus master devices, which assumed little endian byte order in
> +.Tn DMA
> +transfers, even on big endian systems.
> >>
> >> There are a few PCI bus master devices that are big endian aware
> >> (epic(4) fo
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:16:58AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
+The functions were originally introduced to handle
+.Tn PCI
+bus master devices, which assumed little endian byte order in
+.Tn DMA
+transfers, even on big endian systems.
>>
>> There are a few PCI bus master de
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man9: byteorder.9
Log Message:
Reference bswap(3). Improvements in the HISTORY section.
:
cvs rdiff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 src/share/man/man9/byteorder.9
-These functions were introduced to handle PCI bus master devices
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: byteorder.9
>
> Log Message:
> Reference bswap(3). Improvements in the HISTORY section.
:
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 src/share/man/man9/byteorder.9
>> -These functions were introduced to handle PCI bus master devices which
>> assumed
>> -host's memo
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:31:11 +
Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jruoho
> Date: Thu Apr 29 16:31:11 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: signal.9
>
> Log Message:
> Update this, mechanically, to match the new functions and their prototypes
War die Diskussion nicht, dass das Teil eigentlich gar nicht
dokumentiert sein sollte? Insofern halte ich dies fuer falsch...
Joerg
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 10:49:36AM +, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: wiz
> Date: Sun Feb 7 10:49:36 UTC 2010
>
> Modified F
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: dyoung
> Date: Fri Jan 22 20:11:16 UTC 2010
>
> Added Files:
> src/share/man/man9: percpu.9
>
> Log Message:
> Add a manual page for per-CPU storage. Somebody should read this to
> make sure I've described it correctly and intelligibly.
looks go
Please revert this. If anything, the various names should result in
MLINKS, but they should be kept.
Joerg
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:50:57PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jruoho
> Date: Tue Jan 26 21:50:57 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share
Wow - I didn't realize it was so widely used! (Next time, before I
comment, I'll learn to use grep!)
As already pointed out, a large percentage of those references are part
of the various buttons' integration with sysmon/powerd. I think that a
simple mention of this "intended usage" would be
On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:33 PM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> The other places where it is currently used:
>
> * sys/arch/arm/xscale/becc_button.c
> * sys/arch/evbarm/hdl_g/btn_obio.c
> * sys/arch/evbarm/nslu2/nslu2_buttons.c
> * sys/arch/hp700/dev/power.c
> * sys/arch/landi
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:54:45PM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> This routine is really targetted specifically for use by the
> sysmon_envsys(8) facility. This man page seems to imply that it's
> available for general-purpose use.
Well, the sysmon-part is in the name so... :)
While it is target
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Paul Goyette wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Mon Jan 25 16:16:34 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/share/man/man9: Makefile
Added Files:
src/share/man/man9: sysmon_taskq.9
Log Message:
Add a simple manual page for the simple sys
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:32:54 +0200
From: Thomas Klausner
Reply-To: source-changes-d@netbsd.org
To: source-changes-d@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man9
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:54:20AM +, Adam Hoka wrote:
Module Name
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:54:20AM +, Adam Hoka wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: ahoka
> Date: Wed Sep 2 10:54:20 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/man/man9: csf.9
>
> Log Message:
> Mention sched_m4.
# man sched_m2
man: no entry for sched_m2 in the manual.
#
Hi,
> A crusade against British English?
Yes, for example, "colour" versus "color" in the curses manual pages. As
a US-based project, we standardiszed on US English, even though both the
authors naturally use the British English spelling ;-)
Thanks,
J
--
My other computer also runs NetBSD
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:55:36PM -0700, Tom Spindler wrote:
> > src/share/man/man9: scsipi.9
> > Continue my crusade - queueing -> queuing
>
> A crusade against British English?
That's British English? Well I'll be damned.
Anyway, the reason I changed it is because the ATA-7 standard and
I
> src/share/man/man9: scsipi.9
> Continue my crusade - queueing -> queuing
A crusade against British English?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:57:14AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Knowing in advance the number of columns is important if you want to do
> > proper markup for anything not tab-bound.
>
> I see sense both in what you and Uwe are saying. Could we re
46 matches
Mail list logo
