On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:16:58AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote: >>>> +The functions were originally introduced to handle >>>> +.Tn PCI >>>> +bus master devices, which assumed little endian byte order in >>>> +.Tn DMA >>>> +transfers, even on big endian systems. >> >> There are a few PCI bus master devices that are big endian aware >> (epic(4) for example), so I don't think it's appropriate to add >> commas around the which clause. > > I agree that the first comma should go, but the second one (before > "even") should remain.
No it shouldn't. Anyway, I just rearranged it to hopefully avoid such problems entirely. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
