In article <20130315185454.gb22...@apb-laptoy.apb.alt.za>,
Alan Barrett wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> I still don't understand how a missing include does not cause
>> an error in the compilation phase, but it can be ignore in the
>> dependency generation.
>
>tools/compa
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Christos Zoulas wrote:
I still don't understand how a missing include does not cause
an error in the compilation phase, but it can be ignore in the
dependency generation.
tools/compat creates a dummy include file, if necessary. This is
good enough for the compilation pha
In article <20130315130901.gd...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>,
Valery Ushakov wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 16:56:53 +0400, Valery Ushakov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 21:02:06 -0700, Tom Spindler (moof) wrote:
>>
>> > > > >> >Log Message:
>> > > > >> >Revert 1.25 and 1.26: Breaks build on !NetB
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 16:56:53 +0400, Valery Ushakov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 21:02:06 -0700, Tom Spindler (moof) wrote:
>
> > > > >> >Log Message:
> > > > >> >Revert 1.25 and 1.26: Breaks build on !NetBSD
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Can you explain how? The shell does not work?
> > > > >
>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 21:02:06 -0700, Tom Spindler (moof) wrote:
> > > >> >Log Message:
> > > >> >Revert 1.25 and 1.26: Breaks build on !NetBSD
> > > >>
> > > >> Can you explain how? The shell does not work?
> > > >
> > > >E.g. util.h not found in binstall and a lot of other header issues.
> >
