In article <20130315130901.gd...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>,
Valery Ushakov <u...@stderr.spb.ru> wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 16:56:53 +0400, Valery Ushakov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 21:02:06 -0700, Tom Spindler (moof) wrote:
>>
>> > > > >> >Log Message:
>> > > > >> >Revert 1.25 and 1.26: Breaks build on !NetBSD
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Can you explain how? The shell does not work?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >E.g. util.h not found in binstall and a lot of other header issues.
>> > > >
>> > > > On what os?
>> > >
>> > > I've seen it on OSX ( 10.5 PowerPC if it matters ).
>> >
>> > And I've seen it on Debian.
>>
>> That begins to sound like "I've got it on MacOS", err, sorry, "I've
>> got it from Agnes" song. :)
>>
>> Was there an error message, perhaps?
>
>Ah, as Martin pointed out privately, the problem is not some bug in
>the change ("Can you explain how? The shell does not work?"), but the
>fact that a missing include is now fatal, which is a wrong thing to do
>for mkdep.
I still don't understand how a missing include does not cause an error
in the compilation phase, but it can be ignore in the dependency generation.
christos
