On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:40:51PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > And why should the/any static analyzer have to figure that out when
> > coding it right makes it a nonissue?
>
> Because that's what is making warnings useful. To not complain about
> non-issues.
Like this?
const cha
On 11/22/11 4:25 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: tls
> Date: Tue Nov 22 21:25:42 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
[...]
> src/sys/conf: std
>
> Log Message:
> The rnd pseudo-device is not really optional, because it is in the same
> source file as the
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 04:23:46PM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:48:30PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > > > > > Sure it does. You should just have written the code using
> (size_t)1,
> > > > > > > or even just 1UL, instead of 1ULL. There is no port where size_t
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:48:30PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > > > > Sure it does. You should just have written the code using
> > > > > > (size_t)1,
> > > > > > or even just 1UL, instead of 1ULL. There is no port where size_t is
> > > > > > unsigned long long.
> > > > > >
> > >
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:44:24PM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:29:12PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > > > Sure it does. You should just have written the code using (size_t)1,
> > > > > or even just 1UL, instead of 1ULL. There is no port where size_t is
> > >
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:29:12PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > > Sure it does. You should just have written the code using (size_t)1,
> > > > or even just 1UL, instead of 1ULL. There is no port where size_t is
> > > > unsigned long long.
> > > >
> > > > ... Unless what you meant wa
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:18:19PM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:15:12PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > Sure it does. You should just have written the code using (size_t)1,
> > > or even just 1UL, instead of 1ULL. There is no port where size_t is
> > > unsigned
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:15:12PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Sure it does. You should just have written the code using (size_t)1,
> > or even just 1UL, instead of 1ULL. There is no port where size_t is
> > unsigned long long.
> >
> > ... Unless what you meant was "get rid of all 32
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:57:29PM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:01:34PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > Add explicit casts to make lint happy and fix the NetBSD/i386 build.
> >
> > Can we please just get rid of this PoS? This doesn't even q
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:01:34PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > Add explicit casts to make lint happy and fix the NetBSD/i386 build.
>
> Can we please just get rid of this PoS? This doesn't even qualify as bad
> signal to noise ratio.
Sure it does. You should just ha
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 09:00:51AM +, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: tron
> Date: Fri Nov 25 09:00:51 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libc/string: wcscspn_bloom.h
>
> Log Message:
> Add explicit casts to make lint happy and fix the NetBSD/i386
On 11/25/2011 9:23 AM, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 03:51:33PM +, Adam Hoka wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:ahoka
>> Date:Thu Nov 24 15:51:33 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/sys/sys: vnode.h
>> src/sys/ufs: files.ufs
>>
Am 24.11.11 19:44, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: joerg
> Date: Thu Nov 24 18:44:25 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libc/string: wcscspn.c wcspbrk.c
> Added Files:
> src/lib/libc/string: wcscspn_bloom.h
This breaks the build on i386, at
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 03:51:33PM +, Adam Hoka wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: ahoka
> Date: Thu Nov 24 15:51:33 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/sys: vnode.h
> src/sys/ufs: files.ufs
> src/sys/ufs/ufs: ufsmount.h
> Added Files:
> src/sys/ufs/c
14 matches
Mail list logo
