On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:15:12PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > Sure it does. You should just have written the code using (size_t)1, > > or even just 1UL, instead of 1ULL. There is no port where size_t is > > unsigned long long. > > > > ... Unless what you meant was "get rid of all 32-bit ports" :-) > > Well, there is Win64 and this is essentially portable code...
so use (size_t)1 then. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
