Re: Proposed Resolution to create the Web Services Project

On Wednesday 22 January 2003 06:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I will vote against any resolution calling for a "Web Services" project > for the same reason we don't have a "Java" project or a ".NET" project. > Those are marketing names owned and established by other companies. > Find a new name. Pr

Re: Question about JDK 1.1

On Friday 22 November 2002 09:53, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Thursday 21 November 2002 22:51, Scott Nichol wrote: > > Niclas, > > > > What version of Apache SOAP will you be starting with? The use of JDK > > 1.2 features has accelerated over the last 4-6 weeks. As you

Re: Question about JDK 1.1

On Thursday 21 November 2002 22:51, Scott Nichol wrote: > Niclas, > > What version of Apache SOAP will you be starting with? The use of JDK > 1.2 features has accelerated over the last 4-6 weeks. As you guessed, > this is mostly collection classes. Fortunately, the changes are limited > to imple

Re: Question about JDK 1.1

On Wednesday 20 November 2002 12:38, Scott Nichol wrote: > I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think you'll find that 2.3.1 is > at least mostly compatible (maybe some serializer does not work, but > most of the code should). Of course, this assumes the required > supporting jars, such as Jav

Question about JDK 1.1

I don't expect Apache SOAP to be 1.1 compatible (maybe it is), but is there an older version around, available for download? Niclas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Apache SOAP and Axis future

This has probably been asked before, but I can;t find it. What are the strategic differences between Apache Soap and Apache Axis? And will you converge, discontinue or ... ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: maintaing single db connection over multiple rpc calls

We also have _some_ problem with SOAP Sessions, which are terminated a little bit by random. Even if we keep doing a dummy call every now and so often (1min), it happens that a new session is created. This is leading us to not trust Session, and are planning to introduce our own session handli

Re: Http 1.0 session

On Friday 16 August 2002 02:49, Hongda Lin wrote: > Thank you for replying my questions. I meant HTTP 1.0 connection. You > said: " This timeout is often > configurable on the server, but is usually something like 10 or 15 > seconds. > It is almost never longer on even moderately busy servers." >

Re: Collection Serializer

Implmented one already, but not very optimal... Niclas On Friday 12 July 2002 16:35, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Before I write one, > > Anybody got a CollectionSerializer??? > > > Niclas /* * The Apache Software License, Version 1.1 * * * Copyright (c) 2000 The Apache S

Collection Serializer

Before I write one, Anybody got a CollectionSerializer??? Niclas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Reusing SSL-sessions...

On Sunday 07 July 2002 07:45, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Thanks for the useful experiment. It seems to me that if we were > to implement HTTP 1.1 keep-alive then this problem would go away, > right? That is, if the same TCP connection is used for a series > of requests then not its

Re: COMProvider patch and ssl question

On Saturday 06 July 2002 06:05, Scott Nichol wrote: > Furthermore I use https with client and server certificates. > If I call repeatadly it seems that the client just loose the connection > now and again. As this happens the call takes "0" seconds as supposed > to the normal 2-5 seconds. The re

Re: Reusing SSL-sessions...

On Friday 05 July 2002 23:39, Leif Nilsson TACMa wrote: > It might very well be that I have to study the server configuration. > As I use it at the moment (one new fresh SSL-session for each call) > I don't see how it comes in to play however. No wonder you said "a bit slow" in the private email

Re: HELP: SOAP SSL PROXY-problems

On Friday 05 July 2002 16:52, Amazing Arny wrote: > Hi Niclas, > > Java: 1.3.1_02 > JDeveloper: 9.0.2.788 > OC4J: 9.0.2.0.0 And in JDK < 1.4, I think you need to install Java SSL extension, which is part of the JDK 1.4 distro. Niclas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For

Re: HELP: SOAP SSL PROXY-problems

Version of JDK??? On Friday 05 July 2002 15:55, Amazing Arny wrote: > Hi, > > I got a working SOAP-service over SSL without client-certificates. Now I'm > trying to connect to the service trough a proxy with the next code: > System.setProperty("https.proxyHost",""); > System.setProperty("https.

Re: Reusing SSL-sessions...

On Thursday 04 July 2002 23:50, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > You should just re-use the Call object to hold a session. See > the addressbook2 sample for an example. And I assume that if you don't do a call within a reasonable time period, it will timeout the connection. Niclas -- To unsubscrib

Re: Confusing issue on Maps

On Tuesday 02 July 2002 22:54, Scott Nichol wrote: > I am curious: how did Apache SOAP create "the initial illuision of > distributed OO programming but could not support it in its full glory"? I don't think the issue is "Is Apache SOAP a good implementation of SOAP?" but more "Is SOAP good enou

Re: Confusing issue on Maps

On Tuesday 02 July 2002 15:51, Herreman, Christophe wrote: > Am I mistaken if I think that sending a java Vector, or Map or Hashmap over > the SOAP wire will not be received well in a .Net client? > > In our system design, SOAP is used for interoperability and the .NET > compatibility is important

Re: Confusing issue on Maps

On Tuesday 02 July 2002 11:06, Scott Nichol wrote: > From: "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Inherent means to me; "I need to do nothing and it will work". > > 1. MapSerializer is registered by Apache SOAP as a serializer and > deserializer for

Re: Confusing issue on Maps

On Tuesday 02 July 2002 13:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I will conclude by totally agreeing with your last paragraph -- the scope > of application of SOAP is not clear to some. If one likes transparency at a > distributed OO programming level use EJB/CORBA. There are "distributed concerns" that

Re: Confusing issue on Maps

On Tuesday 02 July 2002 10:00, Scott Nichol wrote: > It is "inherent", but only for an exact match of the type Map. When the > Parameter instance is created, the type specified there is used to > determine the serializer. Specifying the type using HashMap.class does not > match the serializer fo

Re: Confusing issue on Maps

On Tuesday 02 July 2002 09:45, Scott Nichol wrote: > To get a TreeMap or HashMap to serialize using MapSerializer, you can > either register the MapSerializer for those types, or specify the parameter > as having a Java type of Map, e.g. > > TreeMap myMap; > Vector params = new Vector(); >

Re: Confusing issue on Maps

On Tuesday 02 July 2002 09:22, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Monday 01 July 2002 23:15, Scott Nichol wrote: > > Have you written and executed code that is giving you an error, or are > > you just raising the issue based on reading code? Also in HashtableSerializer it has a NICE com

Re: Confusing issue on Maps

On Tuesday 02 July 2002 09:22, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > I'll regenerat the exception in a moment. 2002-07-01 17:26:28,742 ERROR [Module-Actions] ts.TargetSpecificationWizardIterator (TargetSpecificationWizardIterator.java:306) - Unable to create Target Specification. [SOAPException: f

Re: Confusing issue on Maps

On Monday 01 July 2002 23:15, Scott Nichol wrote: > Niclas, > > Have you written and executed code that is giving you an error, or are you > just raising the issue based on reading code? Chris is quite correct about > serialization, and that should work just fine. I am concerned about > de-seria

Confusing issue on Maps

I'm pretty new on SOAP, but now I have a need; If I read http://xml.apache.org/soap/releases.html#v2.2 it says; "Added support for serializing/deserializing java.util.Maps." If I download http://xml.apache.org/dist/soap/version-2.3.1/soap-src-2.3.1.tar.gz and look at the file soap-2_3_1/src/