I've submitted a branch for this here:
https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/2694
Thanks!
Mike
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 15:23 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> That'd be ideal, thanks!
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Mike Sheldon cal.com> wrote:
> > Okay great, should I prepare a new branc
That'd be ideal, thanks!
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Mike Sheldon wrote:
> Okay great, should I prepare a new branch that does the renaming?
>
> On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 14:34 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> > Sounds good. If you think ubuntu-download-manager is the way to go,
> > let's move
Okay great, should I prepare a new branch that does the renaming?
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 14:34 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> Sounds good. If you think ubuntu-download-manager is the way to go,
> let's move on with it.
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Mike Sheldon cal.com> wrote:
> > Ah, my
Sounds good. If you think ubuntu-download-manager is the way to go, let's
move on with it.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Mike Sheldon wrote:
> Ah, my mistake. I'd suspect UDM is less likely to change since it's
> already a public facing API being used in third party apps. But it
> sounds like
Ah, my mistake. I'd suspect UDM is less likely to change since it's
already a public facing API being used in third party apps. But it
sounds like we don't lose anything if we start it off as unity8-
download-manager whilst bundled with unity8 if we can then add an
additional interface once its dis
Sorry for not being clear. In addition to the suggestion about
ubuntu-download-manager, I also wrote this:
"Note that part of the rationale of having unity8-contacts and
unity8-calendar named like that was that these interfaces are likely to
change in meaningful and incompatible ways in the near f
Sorry, that was my entire point, I guess I should have expanded on it a
bit. I agree with ubuntu-download-manager as a name, since that's the
name developers will be interacting with if they're using our SDK. For
example under QML they're importing Ubuntu.DownloadManager and the C++
namespace is Ub
The second part of the point was cut out. Can you please at least let us
know how you feel about it, so we can be in sync about the right decision.
On Jan 18, 2017 1:02 PM, "Mike Sheldon"
wrote:
ubuntu-download-manager makes sense as a name to me, especially as it's
one of the APIs in the Ubuntu
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:01:34 +
Mike Sheldon wrote:
> ubuntu-download-manager makes sense as a name to me, especially as
> it's one of the APIs in the Ubuntu SDK.
>
> On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 12:34 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> >
> > The real issue with download-manager is that it's too gene
ubuntu-download-manager makes sense as a name to me, especially as it's
one of the APIs in the Ubuntu SDK.
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 12:34 -0200, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
>
> The real issue with download-manager is that it's too general. We all
> have several download managers in our systems, so this
The real issue with download-manager is that it's too general. We all have
several download managers in our systems, so this gives no hint of what
it's really talking about.
We can call it ubuntu-download-manager if that's how the software was
named. Note that part of the rationale of having unity
Hi all,
Currently the interface for UDM (Ubuntu Download Manager) has been
named unity8-download-manager. It's my understanding that whilst we
might initially be bundling UDM within the unity8 snap to make the
first stages of development easier (e.g. so it can talk directly to
unity8's transfer i
12 matches
Mail list logo
