On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 15:47:58 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> What is the intended way of using this? Do you run make with
>> `LIBPTHREAD=-pthread` or do you apply a patch on `libraries.m4` for the
>> specific way of linking to pthread?
>
>> What is the intended way of using this? Do you run ma
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 12:22:01 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Following on from JDK-8350820, which backed out the _snprintf to snprintf
> change (JDK-8336289) in OperatingSystemImpl.c on Windows, because the counter
> names were being truncated (so CPU monitoring was not possible).
>
> This change mov
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 02:18:35 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
>> The fix implements streaming output support for attach protocol.
>> See JBS issue for evaluation, summary of the changes in the 1st comment.
>> Testing: tier1..4,hs-tier5-svc
>
> Alex Menkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 21:17:04 GMT, Sergey Chernyshev
wrote:
>> OK for me now. `test_cgroupSubsystem_linux.cpp` needs a copyright update as
>> well.
>
>> OK for me now. `test_cgroupSubsystem_linux.cpp` needs a copyright update as
>> well.
>
> Thanks for your review @jerboaa ! I cheched the
> te
> The fix implements streaming output support for attach protocol.
> See JBS issue for evaluation, summary of the changes in the 1st comment.
> Testing: tier1..4,hs-tier5-svc
Alex Menkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
feedback
--
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 14:13:51 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> > Isn't that 32 characters?
>
> Yes thanks well spotted. Just to clarify, looks like I dropped a backslash
> while making that note, the counter would look like `'\Process(java#0)%
> Processor Time' `
>
> 8-)
>
> (Correction, I didn't dro
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 13:25:26 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Isn't that 32 characters?
Yes thanks well spotted. Just to clarify, looks like I dropped a backslash
while making that note, the counter would look like `'\Process(java#0)%
Processor Time' `
8-)
(Correction, I didn't drop a backslash, i
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 10:39:27 GMT, snake66 wrote:
> Replace hardcoded instances of `-lpthread` with `$(LIBPTHREAD)`, so that it's
> possible to parameterize this for platforms that use different flags for
> enabling posix threads.
>
> This work is a continuation of the work done by Greg Lewis in
Replace hardcoded instances of `-lpthread` with `$(LIBPTHREAD)`, so that it's
possible to parameterize this for platforms that use different flags for
enabling posix threads.
This work is a continuation of the work done by Greg Lewis in [1], but
generalized for the full JDK, and set at the conf
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 10:39:27 GMT, snake66 wrote:
> Replace hardcoded instances of `-lpthread` with `$(LIBPTHREAD)`, so that it's
> possible to parameterize this for platforms that use different flags for
> enabling posix threads.
>
> This work is a continuation of the work done by Greg Lewis in
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 14:21:08 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> What is the intended way of using this? Do you run make with
> LIBPTHREAD=-pthread or do you apply a patch on libraries.m4 for the specific
> way of linking to pthread?
This is in preparation of the upcoming BSD port, which uses `-pthread
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 13:53:31 GMT, Antonio Vieiro wrote:
>> Replace hardcoded instances of `-lpthread` with `$(LIBPTHREAD)`, so that
>> it's possible to parameterize this for platforms that use different flags
>> for enabling posix threads.
>>
>> This work is a continuation of the work done by G
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 10:39:27 GMT, snake66 wrote:
> Replace hardcoded instances of `-lpthread` with `$(LIBPTHREAD)`, so that it's
> possible to parameterize this for platforms that use different flags for
> enabling posix threads.
>
> This work is a continuation of the work done by Greg Lewis in
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 15:56:43 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Replace hardcoded instances of `-lpthread` with `$(LIBPTHREAD)`, so that
>> it's possible to parameterize this for platforms that use different flags
>> for enabling posix threads.
>>
>> This work is a continuation of the work done
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 14:15:38 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Replace hardcoded instances of `-lpthread` with `$(LIBPTHREAD)`, so that
>> it's possible to parameterize this for platforms that use different flags
>> for enabling posix threads.
>>
>> This work is a continuation of the work done by Gr
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 17:28:10 GMT, snake66 wrote:
>> make/autoconf/libraries.m4 line 142:
>>
>>> 140: # Threading library
>>> 141: if test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_OS" = xlinux || test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_OS"
>>> = xaix; then
>>> 142: BASIC_JVM_LIBS="$BASIC_JVM_LIBS $(LIBPTHREAD)"
>>
>> If you sp
16 matches
Mail list logo
