On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 06:26:19 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> This small change fixes a warning that may pop up during runtime. May I
>> please request reviews? Thank you!
>
> Maybe you could also call "bin/java -Xcheck:jni
> -agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n -version" which
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 03:17:58 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> Get rid of `list` argument in debug agent's `removeNode()` API. The list is
> stored in the node, so no need to pass it in.
Marked as reviewed by kevinw (Committer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11101
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 21:56:26 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> On the same text but linking to different RFCs: that's tantamount to a bug
> somewhere. The spec for `@spec` dictates that the URLs and titles should be
> in 1-1 correspondence, and this is supposed to be enforced in the docket. In
>
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 22:42:10 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> Here's redo for https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/10687. This PR has two
> commits:
> - 739b79afb1965b625b2002187ac3fd43f385a639 is the same as in the original PR
> - 78455c024ec5c00f1a0ce6c0e13df477c3063fe1 fixes the bug in the original PR.
>
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:45:43 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> It would probably be easier for the reviewers and for you if the PR could be
> broken out by areas into separate PRs
Leaving out the non-public and non-exported classes would also reduce the PR
size.
-
PR: https://git.open
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 01:10:13 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a "somewhat automated" change to insert `@spec` tags into doc
> comments, as appropriate, to leverage the recent new javadoc feature to
> generate a new page listing the references to all external specifications
> listed
The sorted blocks of includes have deteriorated to the point that I felt
compelled to clean up some of the issues.
One of the more prevalent issues is that files in src/hotspot/share/include are
not properly sorted. There has been some discussion that that was done on
purpose, but it just adds
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 01:47:23 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> \-\-\-\-\- Original Message \-\-\-\-\-
>>> From\: \"John R Rose\" \
>>> To\: hotspot\-dev at openjdk\.org\, serviceability\-dev at openjdk\.org\,
>>> shenandoah\-dev at openjdk\.org
>>> Sent\: Thursday\, October 27\, 2022 10\:41\:44 PM
>>>
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:26:20 GMT, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
> The sorted blocks of includes have deteriorated to the point that I felt
> compelled to clean up some of the issues.
>
> One of the more prevalent issues is that files in src/hotspot/share/include
> are not properly sorted. There has b
> This small change fixes a warning that may pop up during runtime. May I
> please request reviews? Thank you!
Lutz Schmidt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8296709: add testcase with active jdwp agent
-
Changes:
-
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 15:33:20 GMT, Lutz Schmidt wrote:
>> This small change fixes a warning that may pop up during runtime. May I
>> please request reviews? Thank you!
>
> Lutz Schmidt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> 8296709
The current loom code makes some assumptions about GC that will not work with
generational ZGC. We should make this code more GC agnostic, and provide a
better interface for talking to the GC.
In particular,
1) All GCs have a way of encoding oops inside of the heap differently to oops
outside o
> This small change fixes a warning that may pop up during runtime. May I
> please request reviews? Thank you!
Lutz Schmidt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8296709: fix testcase naming
-
Changes:
- all: https://git
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 16:16:18 GMT, Erik Österlund wrote:
> The current loom code makes some assumptions about GC that will not work with
> generational ZGC. We should make this code more GC agnostic, and provide a
> better interface for talking to the GC.
>
> In particular,
> 1) All GCs have a
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 16:26:59 GMT, Lutz Schmidt wrote:
>> This small change fixes a warning that may pop up during runtime. May I
>> please request reviews? Thank you!
>
> Lutz Schmidt has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> 8296709
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:26:20 GMT, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
> The sorted blocks of includes have deteriorated to the point that I felt
> compelled to clean up some of the issues.
>
> One of the more prevalent issues is that files in src/hotspot/share/include
> are not properly sorted. There has b
On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 19:41:56 GMT, Erik Österlund wrote:
> Nice to have PR 1. It's gonna take a long time until we see 11.
Nice PR number :-)
May I ask if you could also add handling for riscv while you are at it? We have
ported loom to this platform recently [1].
[1] https://git.openjd
17 matches
Mail list logo
