Re: RFR: 8330302: strace004 can still fail

2024-09-18 Thread Viktor Klang
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:08:43 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> So no change to >> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/share/ThreadController.java and >> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/share/thread/SleepingThread.java >> this time? >> >> Is there a JBS issue to re-write these

Re: RFR: 8330302: strace004 can still fail

2024-09-13 Thread David Holmes
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:12:04 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> This is a trivial point fix for the `strace` tests to add in the missing >> event (super)constructors. These tests have started failing more regularly >> after the `Thread.sleep` code was recently changed. >> >> The fragility of these te

Re: RFR: 8330302: strace004 can still fail [v2]

2024-09-13 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:54:40 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> This is a trivial point fix for the `strace` tests to add in the missing >> event (super)constructors. These tests have started failing more regularly >> after the `Thread.sleep` code was recently changed. >> >> The fragility of these te

Re: RFR: 8330302: strace004 can still fail [v2]

2024-09-13 Thread David Holmes
> This is a trivial point fix for the `strace` tests to add in the missing > event (super)constructors. These tests have started failing more regularly > after the `Thread.sleep` code was recently changed. > > The fragility of these tests is well known but I simply want to deal with > current f

Re: RFR: 8330302: strace004 can still fail [v2]

2024-09-13 Thread Alan Bateman
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:54:40 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> This is a trivial point fix for the `strace` tests to add in the missing >> event (super)constructors. These tests have started failing more regularly >> after the `Thread.sleep` code was recently changed. >> >> The fragility of these te

Re: RFR: 8330302: strace004 can still fail

2024-09-12 Thread David Holmes
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 06:12:04 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> This is a trivial point fix for the `strace` tests to add in the missing >> event (super)constructors. These tests have started failing more regularly >> after the `Thread.sleep` code was recently changed. >> >> The fragility of these te

Re: RFR: 8330302: strace004 can still fail

2024-09-12 Thread Alan Bateman
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:18:48 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > This is a trivial point fix for the `strace` tests to add in the missing > event (super)constructors. These tests have started failing more regularly > after the `Thread.sleep` code was recently changed. > > The fragility of these tests i

Re: RFR: 8330302: strace004 can still fail

2024-09-12 Thread Alan Bateman
On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:18:48 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > This is a trivial point fix for the `strace` tests to add in the missing > event (super)constructors. These tests have started failing more regularly > after the `Thread.sleep` code was recently changed. > > The fragility of these tests i

RFR: 8330302: strace004 can still fail

2024-09-12 Thread David Holmes
This is a trivial point fix for the `strace` tests to add in the missing event (super)constructors. These tests have started failing more regularly after the `Thread.sleep` code was recently changed. The fragility of these tests is well known but I simply want to deal with current failures in o