On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:30:49 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> This test fails when additional threads are created, as it compares thread
> lists from different sources and sees a mismatch.
>
> It needs to tolerate some threads with certain names appearing, e.g. JVMCI
> and ForkJoin threads. If there
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:30:49 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> This test fails when additional threads are created, as it compares thread
> lists from different sources and sees a mismatch.
>
> It needs to tolerate some threads with certain names appearing, e.g. JVMCI
> and ForkJoin threads. If there
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:13:59 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/MethodExitRequest/addClassExclusionFilter/filter001.java
>> line 77:
>>
>>> 75: private String classExclName1 = "java";
>>> 76: private String classExclName2 = "sun";
>>> 77: private Stri
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:24:31 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> The test gets overloaded with MethodExitEvents, causing them to queue up (in
> the JDI queue) and continue to be processed by the test after the debuggee
> exits. This results in a VMDisconnectedException when the test tries to do
> the
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:30:49 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> This test fails when additional threads are created, as it compares thread
> lists from different sources and sees a mismatch.
>
> It needs to tolerate some threads with certain names appearing, e.g. JVMCI
> and ForkJoin threads. If there
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:54:22 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>> The test gets overloaded with MethodExitEvents, causing them to queue up (in
>> the JDI queue) and continue to be processed by the test after the debuggee
>> exits. This results in a VMDisconnectedException when the test tries to do
>>
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:30:49 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> This test fails when additional threads are created, as it compares thread
> lists from different sources and sees a mismatch.
>
> It needs to tolerate some threads with certain names appearing, e.g. JVMCI
> and ForkJoin threads. If there
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 04:53:58 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Updated the version to 22-ea and year to 2024.
>
> The following unpublished changes will also be included in this update:
> - [JDK-8290626](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290626): keytool manpage
> contains a special character
> - [
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:24:31 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> The test gets overloaded with MethodExitEvents, causing them to queue up (in
> the JDI queue) and continue to be processed by the test after the debuggee
> exits. This results in a VMDisconnectedException when the test tries to do
> the
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:28:01 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> > Just curious, since you have access to the secret closed sources, can you
> > not backport these changes yourself? Instead of just deleting them and
> > expecting someone else to rescue them from oblivion?
>
> @archiecobbs we (Oracle) w
The test gets overloaded with MethodExitEvents, causing them to queue up (in
the JDI queue) and continue to be processed by the test after the debuggee
exits. This results in a VMDisconnectedException when the test tries to do the
following after getting an event:
`String str = ((MethodExit
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:25:14 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> Updated the version to 22-ea and year to 2024.
>>
>> The following unpublished changes will also be included in this update:
>> - [JDK-8290626](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290626): keytool
>> manpage contains a special charact
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 19:21:01 GMT, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Just curious, since you have access to the secret closed sources, can you not
> backport these changes yourself? Instead of just deleting them and expecting
> someone else to rescue them from oblivion?
@archiecobbs we (Oracle) will take
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:30:49 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> This test fails when additional threads are created, as it compares thread
> lists from different sources and sees a mismatch.
>
> It needs to tolerate some threads with certain names appearing, e.g. JVMCI
> and ForkJoin threads. If there
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:30:49 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> This test fails when additional threads are created, as it compares thread
> lists from different sources and sees a mismatch.
>
> It needs to tolerate some threads with certain names appearing, e.g. JVMCI
> and ForkJoin threads. If there
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:07:37 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> This looks good in general. However, I'm looking at the
> `stackChunkOopDesc::do_barriers0()` implementation and wonder if a similar
> trick is needed for interpreter frames (to support `Class Redefinition`):
>
This code collects refe
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 04:53:58 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> The following changes, to javac.1, were never applied to the closed sources
> and are "lost" by this update. These changes will need to be re-applied
> directly in JDK 21 and JDK 22
Just curious, since you have access to the secret closed
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 04:53:58 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Updated the version to 22-ea and year to 2024.
>
> The following unpublished changes will also be included in this update:
> - [JDK-8290626](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290626): keytool manpage
> contains a special character
> - [
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 04:53:58 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Updated the version to 22-ea and year to 2024.
>
> The following unpublished changes will also be included in this update:
> - [JDK-8290626](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290626): keytool manpage
> contains a special character
> - [
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 18:50:42 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
>> src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/resources/compiler_de.properties
>> line 140:
>>
>>> 138:
>>> 139: # 0: type, 1: name
>>> 140: compiler.err.annotation.unrecognized.attribute.name=Annotation @{0}
>>> weist das unbekannte
This test fails when additional threads are created, as it compares thread
lists from different sources and sees a mismatch.
It needs to tolerate some threads with certain names appearing, e.g. JVMCI and
ForkJoin threads. If there are extra threads in the thread ID list from the
ThreadMBean, r
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 04:53:58 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Updated the version to 22-ea and year to 2024.
>
> The following unpublished changes will also be included in this update:
> - [JDK-8290626](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290626): keytool manpage
> contains a special character
> - [
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 01:02:09 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> If virtual thread has frames in stackChunks, need to apply load barriers
> before processing nmethods (javaVFrame::locals() and
> javaVFrame::expressions() do it internally)
>
> Testing: tier1-tier5 (still in progress);
> 400 runs of VThre
23 matches
Mail list logo
