On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:28:17 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it
> feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL,
> not
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:28:17 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it
> feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL,
> not
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:28:17 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it
> feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL,
> not
On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 07:44:49 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> I was thinking of a different way to say , that would not
> loose the descriptiveness, but none so far. Any more descriptive/specific
> suggestions than ?
I understand why you ended up with that choice of words, since it is not
trivial to
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:28:17 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it
> feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL,
> not
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:28:17 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it
> feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL,
> not
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:38:01 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Yay! This looks so much better than the default blob. I think you are on the
> right track, but the actual message can do with some fine tuning. For
> instance, `` seems a bit ... untypically non-formal. What
> about just ``?
I am n
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:28:17 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it
> feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL,
> not
Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that is
a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it
feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL, not
the `java` launcher, but it is difficult find out about JShel
