On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:17:40 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Removed useless event settings in test.
I plan to int
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:17:40 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Removed useless event settings in test.
Marked as rev
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Removed useless event settings in test.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17129/files
- new:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:53:49 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Changes according to reviewer's comments.
>
>> You mean, in the @description annotation?
>
> Yes.
> @egahlin Ar
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:56:45 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Small space optimization.
Anybody from security wants
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:53:49 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Changes according to reviewer's comments.
>
>> You mean, in the @description annotation?
>
> Yes.
@egahlin Are
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:56:45 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Small space optimization.
Thanks for the updates. LG
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Small space optimization.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17129/files
- new: https://git.op
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:41:41 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> The spec is silent about methods being 'native'; it would generally be
>> impractical to implement native methods for these purposes, but a native
>> method can implement the behavior.
>
> @RogerRiggs The checks are agnostic about
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:58:43 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> I'm not sure that a `native` method is not considered effective by
>> serialization. I have to check.
>
> The spec is silent about methods being 'native'; it would generally be
> impractical to implement native methods for these purposes,
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:55:58 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Changes according to reviewers feedback.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/SerializationMisdeclarationCheck
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:49:50 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Conceptually, these are independent types. There's no logical relationship
>> between them. Sharing a zero length array would convey a false sense of
>> logical sharing.
>
> true, but its wasted space and IMHO ok as a local and private imp
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:58:10 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/SerializationMisdeclarationChecker.java
>> line 185:
>>
>>> 183: commitEvent(PRIV_METH_NON_STATIC,
>>> 184: m + " must be non-static to be effective");
>>> 185:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:43:46 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Changes according to reviewers feedback.
src/java.bas
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:41:31 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/SerializationMisdeclarationChecker.java
>> line 53:
>>
>>> 51: private static final Class[] READ_OBJECT_NO_DATA_PARAM_TYPES =
>>> {};
>>> 52: private static final Class[] WRITE_REPLACE_P
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:46:27 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/SerializationMisdeclarationChecker.java
>> line 70:
>>
>>> 68: privilegedCheckAccessibleMethod(cl, WRITE_REPLACE_NAME,
>>> 69: WRITE_REPLACE_PARAM_TYPES, Object.cl
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Changes according to reviewers feedback.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17129/files
- new:
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 18:31:49 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Yes, that's perhaps clearer, will do.
>
> Typically in other places in the JDK we use `priviledgedXxx` for naming
> methods that are simple wrappers that call `xxx` from within a
> `doPrivileged`. The method is called privileged because it
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:42:58 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/SerializationMisdeclarationChecker.java
>> line 87:
>>
>>> 85: }
>>> 86: if (cl.isEnum()) {
>>> 87: commitEvent(cl, SUID_NAME + " in an enum class is not
>>> effectiv
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 18:38:52 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request with a new target base due
>> to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 15
>> additional comm
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 18:15:36 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request with a new target base due
>> to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated
>> changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 15
>> additional comm
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 13:48:06 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request with a new target base due
> to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
> brought in by the me
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 15 additional commits
since the
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Simplified event messages.
Remove ckecker allocation.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17129
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 21:24:43 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Corrected @Label of event and of field.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ObjectStreamClass.java line 466:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:53:10 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Corrected @Label of event and of field.
src/java.base
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Corrected @Label of event and of field.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17129/files
- new:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:36:06 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Removed @module from test.
src/jdk.jfr/share/classes/
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Removed @module from test.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17129/files
- new: https://git.o
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional commits
since the
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Minor changes.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17129/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/j
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Removed event kind.
serialVersionUID must have type long.
Test now base on keyword search in event message.
Commented test
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 14:28:39 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Changes according to reviewer's comments.
>
> It would also be useful/interesting to include a test that checks e
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 14:17:19 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Same remark here about finality as
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/17129#discussion_r1432400888. public
>> statics should be final.
>
> I'd also remove the error codes, the string messages will be pretty stable
> and the extra surf
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 15:01:02 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/SerializationMisdeclarationChecker.java
>> line 113:
>>
>>> 111: if (longFromStatic(f) == null) {
>>> 112: commitEvent(SUID_CONVERTIBLE_TO_LONG,
>>> 113:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 14:28:39 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Changes according to reviewer's comments.
>
> It would also be useful/interesting to include a test that checks e
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:45:04 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Changes according to reviewer's comments.
It would al
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:45:04 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Changes according to reviewer's comments.
src/java.ba
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:29:19 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> You could define them with an Enum but use the ordinal as the value for JFR.
>
> Same remark here about finality as
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/17129#discussion_r1432400888. public
> statics should be final.
I'd also remove the
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 19:19:35 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Better name for a label, corrected name of removed field.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/SerializationMi
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 19:39:22 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> What about fixed `String`s rather than `int`s for the kind of error?
>> Something like `"SUID_INEFFECTIVE_ON_ENUM"`, and so on?
>> It would be nice to be able to use enums, but AFAIK that's not supported in
>> JFR.
>
> You could define them
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:00:09 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/event/SerializationMisdeclarationEvent.java
>> line 94:
>>
>>> 92:
>>> 93: /*
>>> 94: * These constants are not final on purpose.
>>
>> Just curious - what's the purpose? I don't
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:21:05 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Better name for a label, corrected name of removed fie
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:41:57 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Users (not OpenJDK developers) don't know what the error code means. I think
>> it's better to not have them. This is how other events work. If you want to
>> guard against changes, I would export the package to the test.
>
> What
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:37:50 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/SerializationMisdeclarationChecker.java
>> line 39:
>>
>>> 37: import static java.lang.reflect.Modifier.*;
>>> 38:
>>> 39: final class SerializationMisdeclarationChecker {
>>
>> Is there a rea
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:45:04 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Changes according to reviewer's comments.
> You mean,
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:45:04 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Changes according to reviewer's comments.
You mean, i
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:13:58 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> The intent is that they are stable and for programmatic usage, whereas the
>> message is more for human consumption. The codes are used in the test, for
>> example, and are declared as public static in the event classes.
>>
>> Alternative
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:15:40 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Changes according to reviewer's comments.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/SerializationMisdeclarationChec
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:28:03 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> However, the cache can be emptied under high memory pressure, so the
> `ObjectStreamClass` instance might be recreated later, thus re-invoking the
> serialization checker once again.
I think it would be good to state in the descri
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:00:59 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> test/jdk/jdk/jfr/event/io/TestSerializationMisdeclarationEvent.java line 50:
>>
>>> 48: * @requires vm.hasJFR
>>> 49: * @library /test/lib
>>> 50: * @run junit/othervm
>>> jdk.jfr.event.io.TestSerializationMisdeclarationEvent
>
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:45:04 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Changes according to reviewer's comments.
src/java.ba
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:17:38 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> src/jdk.jfr/share/classes/jdk/jfr/events/SerializationMisdeclarationEvent.java
>> line 48:
>>
>>> 46:
>>> 47: @Label("Kind")
>>> 48: public int kind;
>>
>> What is the use case for error codes? Are they public or an impl
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Changes according to reviewer's comments.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17129/files
- new
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:56:39 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> > Is it per class for each classloader that loads it? Or is it per class per
> > JVM? It's more out of curiosity than anything else because I don't think it
> > makes a big difference (I don't expect too many classloaders that woul
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:39:47 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Is it per class for each classloader that loads it? Or is it per class per
> JVM? It's more out of curiosity than anything else because I don't think it
> makes a big difference (I don't expect too many classloaders that would lead
> to t
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:21:05 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Better name for a label, corrected name of removed fie
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:21:05 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Better name for a label, corrected name of removed fie
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:21:05 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Better name for a label, corrected name of removed fie
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:21:05 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Better name for a label, corrected name of removed fie
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:21:05 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Better name for a label, corrected name of removed fie
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:21:05 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Better name for a label, corrected name of removed fie
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:21:05 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Better name for a label, corrected name of removed fie
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:21:05 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Better name for a label, corrected name of removed fie
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:43:57 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Event enabled on profile.jfc but disabled on default.jfc.
>
> src/jdk.jfr/share/classes/jdk/jfr/events/Serializat
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Better name for a label, corrected name of removed field.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/171
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:49:04 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Event enabled on profile.jfc but disabled on default.j
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 01:27:17 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Restrict accessibility of nested classes.
>
> It seems correct to have the event disabled in both configurations.
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Event enabled on profile.jfc but disabled on default.jfc.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/171
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 01:27:17 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Restrict accessibility of nested classes.
>
> It seems correct to have the event disabled in both configurations.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 22:26:04 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
>
> Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Restrict accessibility of nested classes.
It seems co
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
Raffaello Giulietti has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Restrict accessibility of nested classes.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17129/files
- new
Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
-
Commit messages:
- Make use of EventNames.
- Merge branch 'master' into 8275338
- 8275338: Add JFR events for notable serialization situations
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17129/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 17:34:53 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
> Adds serialization misdeclaration events to JFR.
A serialization misdeclaration on one of the following fields or methods means
that they are not declared according to the Java Object Serialization
Specification (JOSS) or in the J
74 matches
Mail list logo
