On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 22:31:57 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Bug needs a noreg label, but otherwise looks fine.
Thanks. I chose `noreg-undo`.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22522#issuecomment-2515699497
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:31:30 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Revert a previous change to a file from an upstream Apache repo.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 82e8aa62
Author:Weijun Wang
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/82e8aa62de5d6854978efd66190654f05299e523
S
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 22:26:17 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> A few additional changes should be made to the API specs for these classes .
>> These changes are documenting behavior of other APIs that has already been
>> approved as part of JEP 486, so I don't think a CSR is necessary, but
>> opinion
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:26:54 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote:
>> SAP complains about SSLSocketNoServerHelloClientShutdown timing out in their
>> test environment (concurrent test execution with high CPU load). This change
>> addresses this issue in 2 ways:
>> - Increase default timeout value
>> - All
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 22:26:17 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> A few additional changes should be made to the API specs for these classes .
>> These changes are documenting behavior of other APIs that has already been
>> approved as part of JEP 486, so I don't think a CSR is necessary, but
>> opinion
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 21:10:24 GMT, Artur Barashev wrote:
>> I don't think we need this second one here.
>
> What would be the first one? Server thread is timing out but I don't think we
> need to reverse the logic because of this, we are expecting an exception in
> the server thread, the client
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:31:30 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Revert a previous change to a file from an upstream Apache repo.
Bug needs a noreg label, but otherwise looks fine.
-
Marked as reviewed by mullan (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22522#pullrequestreview-
> A few additional changes should be made to the API specs for these classes .
> These changes are documenting behavior of other APIs that has already been
> approved as part of JEP 486, so I don't think a CSR is necessary, but
> opinions on that are welcome.
>
> The `DomainCombiner` and `Subj
> In addition to the goals, scope, motivation, specification and requirement
> notes in [JDK-8315487](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8315487), we would
> like to describe the most relevant decisions taken during the implementation
> of this enhancement. These notes are organized by feature,
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:50:47 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet
wrote:
> Hi, this pull request modifies the _SunNativeGSS_ security provider to stop
> using the legacy Provider APIs (`Provider::putAll`) and start using the new
> ones (`Provider::putService`).
>
> Changes in this pull request ha
Revert a previous change to a file from an upstream Apache repo.
-
Commit messages:
- the change
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22522/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=22522&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345415
Stats: 76 l
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:31:01 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet
wrote:
>> Hi, this pull request modifies the _SunNativeGSS_ security provider to stop
>> using the legacy Provider APIs (`Provider::putAll`) and start using the new
>> ones (`Provider::putService`).
>>
>> Changes in this pull reques
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:31:01 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet
wrote:
>> Hi, this pull request modifies the _SunNativeGSS_ security provider to stop
>> using the legacy Provider APIs (`Provider::putAll`) and start using the new
>> ones (`Provider::putService`).
>>
>> Changes in this pull reques
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:12:39 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>
> Dependent on PR#22418
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: fcf185c8
Author:Roger Riggs
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/fcf185c8b425a698
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 14:53:41 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove an obsolete comment related to long ago removed useNewThrowable
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StackS
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 14:45:22 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Remove an obsolete comment r
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 14:45:22 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Remove an obsolete comment r
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:40:39 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'master' into 8345325-sm-remove-getpropertyaction
>> - Remove unused import o
> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>
> Dependent on PR#22418
Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Remove an obsolete comment related to long ago removed useNewThrowable
-
Changes
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 06:14:31 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/CgroupSubsystemController.java
>> line 68:
>>
>>> 66: try (Stream lines = Files.lines(filePath)) {
>>> 67: Optional firstLine = lines.findFirst();
>>> 68: re
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 13:43:25 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> A few additional changes should be made to the API specs for these classes .
>> These changes are documenting behavior of other APIs that has already been
>> approved as part of JEP 486, so I don't think a CSR is necessary, but
>> opinio
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:18:33 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> A few additional changes should be made to the API specs for these classes .
> These changes are documenting behavior of other APIs that has already been
> approved as part of JEP 486, so I don't think a CSR is necessary, but
> opinions on
A few additional changes should be made to the API specs for these classes .
These changes are documenting behavior of other APIs that has already been
approved as part of JEP 486, so I don't think a CSR is necessary, but opinions
on that are welcome.
The `DomainCombiner` and `SubjectDomainCom
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:51:55 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits:
>
> -
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 06:12:13 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
>> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
>> changes?
>>
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
>>
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 06:12:13 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
>> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
>> changes?
>>
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
>>
26 matches
Mail list logo
