On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:51:55 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits:
>
> -
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 17:47:57 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 13 commits:
>>
>> - merge latest from master branch
>> - remove changes to
>> src/java.base/unix/classes/sun/s
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:54:33 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/misc/InnocuousThread.java line 31:
>>
>>> 29:
>>> 30: /**
>>> 31: * A thread that has no permissions, is not a member of any user-defined
>>
>> I think you can also remove the words "has no permis
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
> changes?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
> changes are trivial. The
> `src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:51:55 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits:
>
> -
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:51:55 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits:
>
> -
> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>
> This should cover most of the remaining cleanup in the security libraries
> area. A couple of the `s
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:51:55 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits:
>
> -
> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>
> Dependent on PR#22418
Roger Riggs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The pull request now contains 15 commits:
- Merge branch 'master' into 8345325-sm-remove-getpropertyaction
-
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 21:18:10 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet has updated the pull request with a new target
>> base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains three commits:
>>
>> - Merge openjdk/master into JDK-8345221
>> - Method rename.
>>
>>Co-
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
> changes?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
> changes are trivial. The
> `src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 22:02:54 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> This includes a lot of changes already integrated in 8344397. Is that normal?
I believe this is due to GitHub's diff rendering when it detects a merge
conflict. It should go away once the conflict is fixed.
-
PR Comment: https
> Hi, this pull request modifies the _SunNativeGSS_ security provider to stop
> using the legacy Provider APIs (`Provider::putAll`) and start using the new
> ones (`Provider::putService`).
>
> Changes in this pull request have been removed from #15539, as they aren't a
> dependency for that wor
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 21:19:29 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Do you need a `noreg-` label for the JBS issue?
Sounds good. Added.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22461#issuecomment-2513077138
> Hi, this pull request modifies the _SunNativeGSS_ security provider to stop
> using the legacy Provider APIs (`Provider::putAll`) and start using the new
> ones (`Provider::putService`). Additionally, it removes
> `sun.security.action.PutAllAction`, no longer used since #22256.
>
> Changes in
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:47:16 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
> commits since the last revision:
>
> - Remove unused import of Pr
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:51:12 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>
> This should cover most of the remaining cleanu
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:40:40 GMT, Kevin Driver wrote:
> JDK-8341775: In the case where there is a *single* META-INF directory but
> potentially *multiple* manifest files of different cases, print a warning
> before selecting the first one and ignoring the rest (the current behavior
> should be
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:35:55 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
>> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>>
>> This should cover most of the remaining cl
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:59:53 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
>> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>>
>> This should cover most of the remaining cl
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:42:37 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> remove changes to
>> src/java.base/unix/classes/sun/security/provider/NativePRNG.java
>
> src/java.base/unix/classes/su
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:29:24 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> I am seing some doPrivileged in
> `src/java.base/unix/classes/sun/security/provider/NativePRNG.java` - should
> this PR also fix them?
Good catch. Fixed in
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22418/commits/91afd302b91651923a4a075d9fc129f
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:43:41 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - remove unnecessary space
>> - Path.of() instead of Paths.get()
>> - fix formatting of try-with-resources in Cgro
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
> changes?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
> changes are trivial. The
> `src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:16:02 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
>> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
>> changes?
>>
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
>>
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
> changes?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
> changes are trivial. The
> `src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 14:50:47 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet
wrote:
> Hi, this pull request modifies the _SunNativeGSS_ security provider to stop
> using the legacy Provider APIs (`Provider::putAll`) and start using the new
> ones (`Provider::putService`). Additionally, it removes
> `sun.sec
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:06:14 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security.KeyStore` and `Identity`
> API and impl dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager`,
> `AccessController.doPrivileged` and `AccessControlContext` can be removed.
>
> Most of the changes
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:25:12 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - remove unused import
>> - replace remaining Paths.get() with Path.of() in the updated files
>
> src/java.base/linux/c
> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>
> This should cover most of the remaining cleanup in the security libraries
> area. A couple of the `s
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
> changes?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
> changes are trivial. The
> `src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:39:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
>> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
>> changes?
>>
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
>>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:47:16 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
> commits since the last revision:
>
> - Remove unused import of Pr
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 00:37:45 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> Martin Balao has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Undo SunNativeProvider provider changes. They will be implemented in
>> JDK-8345221.
>
> Thank you for the respon
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:59:53 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
>> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>>
>> This should cover most of the remaining cl
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:59:53 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
>> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>>
>> This should cover most of the remaining cl
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:17:10 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> cgroups changes look good. Haven't looked at the other bits.
Thank you Severin.
> src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/CgroupSubsystemController.java
> line 29:
>
>> 27: package jdk.internal.platform;
>> 28:
>> 29: import
> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>
> This should cover most of the remaining cleanup in the security libraries
> area. A couple of the `s
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:12:55 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
>> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>>
>> This should cover most of the remaining cl
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:40:23 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> Yes, with Sean's changes in #22418, GetPropertyAction et.al. is deleted.
>
> @RogerRiggs Alan may have referred to the import of `java.util.Properties`.
Right, thanks
-
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/224
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:28:13 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandleNatives.java line
>> 710:
>>
>>> 708:
>>> 709: static {
>>> 710: Properties props = GetPropertyAction.privilegedGetProperties();
>>
>> This is probably the last usage of
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:44:05 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
> commits since the last revision:
>
> - Remove unused import of Pr
> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>
> Dependent on PR#22418
Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- Remove unused import of Properties
- Update copyrights
Remove jdk/sun/security/action/Ge
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:19:23 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>>
>> Dependent on PR#22418
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandleNatives.java line
> 710:
>
>> 708:
>> 709: static {
>> 710: Properties p
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:12:39 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>
> Dependent on PR#22418
LGTM
-
Marked as reviewed by naoto (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22497#pullrequestreview-2473841217
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:12:39 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>
> Dependent on PR#22418
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandleNatives.java line 710:
> 708:
> 709: static {
> 710: Properties props = GetPrope
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:12:39 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
>
> Dependent on PR#22418
Changes Look Good Roger
-
Marked as reviewed by lancea (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22497#pullrequestreview-2
Remove sun/security/action/GetPropertyAction.java and all uses.
Dependent on PR#22418
-
Depends on: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22418
Commit messages:
- 8345325: SM cleanup of GetPropertyAction in java.base
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22497/files
Webrev: https
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:07:45 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Is the catch for `UncheckedIOException` due to some previously known failure
>> resulting in the use of these APIs?
>
> Without using `Files.lines()` no `UncheckedIOException` would be thrown. Just
> `IOException` and `null` returned. T
> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>
> This should cover most of the remaining cleanup in the security libraries
> area. A couple of the `s
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:11:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
>> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
>> changes?
>>
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
>>
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:18:36 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Removal of unused fields from AccessControlContext - no longer needed now
>> that VM cleanup is done.
>
> src/java.base
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:12:55 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
>> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>>
>> This should cover most of the remaining cl
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:12:55 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
>> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>>
>> This should cover most of the remaining cl
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 17:29:44 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The system property was used to signal a case where a certain permission is
> required. It's now useless.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: d6a5f1ba
Author:Weijun Wang
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 17:29:44 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The system property was used to signal a case where a certain permission is
> required. It's now useless.
Marked as reviewed by mullan (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22492#pullrequestreview-2473728847
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:24:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
>> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
>> changes?
>>
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
>>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:24:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
>> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
>> changes?
>>
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
>>
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 16:20:56 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet
wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Removal of unused fields from AccessControlContext - no longer needed now
>> that VM cleanup is done.
>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:12:55 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
>> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>>
>> This should cover most of the remaining cl
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:58:10 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> > The system property was used to signal a case where a certain permission is
> > required. It's not useless.
>
> I assume you mean "It's now useless"?
Yes. Fixed.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22492#issuecomm
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 17:29:44 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The system property was used to signal a case where a certain permission is
> required. It's now useless.
> The system property was used to signal a case where a certain permission is
> required. It's not useless.
I assume you mean "It's n
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:03:10 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/CgroupSubsystemController.java
>> line 70:
>>
>>> 68: String line = bufferedReader.readLine();
>>> 69: return line;
>>> 70: } catch (IOException e) {
>>
>>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:48:27 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 13 commits:
>>
>> - merge latest from master branch
>> - remove changes to
>> src/java.base/unix/classes/sun/se
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 19:59:24 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
>> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>>
>> This should cover most of the remaining c
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:11:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
>> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
>> changes?
>>
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
>>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:39:55 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> I just pushed [a
> change](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22418/commits/a447dd44da5394620c62bac7e05142898d092153)
> to replace the remaining calls to
> `SecurityProperties.privilegedGetOverridable()`with
> `SecurityProperties.getOverr
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:12:55 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security` and `sun.security`
>> implementation dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager` and
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` can be removed.
>>
>> This should cover most of the remaining cl
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:54:57 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Removal of unused fields from AccessControlContext - no longer needed now
>> that VM cleanup is done.
>
> src/java.base/s
The system property was used to signal a case where a certain permission is
required. It's not useless.
-
Commit messages:
- the fix
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22492/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=22492&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:11:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
>> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
>> changes?
>>
>> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
>>
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:39:21 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Now that JEP 486 has been integrated, `java.security.KeyStore` and
>> `Identity` API and impl dependencies on `System.getSecurityManager`,
>> `AccessController.doPrivileged` and `AccessControlContext` can be removed.
>>
>> Most of the cha
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
> changes?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
> changes are trivial. The
> `src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
> changes?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
> changes are trivial. The
> `src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:06:05 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Path.of() instead of Paths.get() in CgroupV2Subsystem.java
>
> src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platform/cgro
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:43:20 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - remove unnecessary space
>> - Path.of() instead of Paths.get()
>> - fix formatting of try-with-resources in CgroupS
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
> changes?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
> changes are trivial. The
> `src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:42:47 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - remove unnecessary space
>> - Path.of() instead of Paths.get()
>> - fix formatting of try-with-resources in CgroupS
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:13:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
> changes?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
> change
Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
changes?
This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
changes are trivial. The
`src/java.base/linux/classes/jdk/internal/platf
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:13:57 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which removes usages of
> SecurityManager related APIs and some leftover related to SecurityManager
> changes?
>
> This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345286. Most of these
> change
81 matches
Mail list logo
