Is notUsed() on PDK buggy, or am I missing something?
notUsed is not exact, it errs on the safe side if in doubt. This means
that when notUsed first gets implemented for a port, it gets implemented
"good enough" for the first few use-cases. Over time it can then be
refined to become more accu
On 11/01/2024 11:11, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
I'll try to look into making notUsed work better for your use case. If
there is no corresponding commit to the next branch this week, I
suggest to open a feature request ticket, so this doesn't get forgotten.
Okay, thanks. I will do that.
Regar
Just as an addendum, I note that a feature request for peephole
optimisations for the scenario I have been talking about already exists:
#801 (https://sourceforge.net/p/sdcc/feature-requests/801/).
I see that the submitter also observes that notUsed('a') is "not handled
well at most conditions
