chard
Gray
Sent: Friday, 5 September 2008 9:28 AM
To: sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Z80/Z180 MMU question(s)
Well, I created a nice heap of EPROMS for the eraser in the attempt!
I've ended-up with a reasonably satisfactory result - the analyser tells
me my
stack is at the top of memor
Well, I created a nice heap of EPROMS for the eraser in the attempt!
I've ended-up with a reasonably satisfactory result - the analyser tells me my
stack is at the top of memory (17FFF), which is what I wanted. This means
I've got 64K of stack, which seems a bit excessive; but what the hell. My
Richard,
Glad to hear that you solved your problem.
I was literally composing a response for you when your message arrived a
few minutes ago - good timing. (I'm no expert but no one else seemed to
be jumping in so I was going to have a go based on faded memories of a
much earlier project :->)
C
After a few educated guesses and with the help of my trusty logic analyser, I
have solved this problem.
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 01:44:33 Richard Gray wrote:
> Can anyone set me straight on this, especially bearing in mind that SDCC
> doesn't know anything about the 20-bit address space or
Hi Folks,
Somewhat tangential to the hullabaloo going on at the moment about
documentation, I'm bound to say that Zilog's documentation about the Z180 MMU
is perplexing for me at least. For comparison's sake, I looked-up the Hitachi
64180 documentation and that was no more enlightening.
I unde
