On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
> hi Maarten, hi Erik,
>
> thanks a lot by your feedback! Below I got 2 contradicting opinions: if I
> understand Erik right, there is no easy fix to this problem and I should
> just skip the declaration in the interrupt header file (like for
> Rai
tement (in contrast to first gut feeling), i.e. this
> wonât be supported by SDCC anytime soon? For your feedback thanks a lot
> in advance!
>
> Georg
>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 23:10:07 +0100 (CET)
>> Fro
!
Georg
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 23:10:07 +0100 (CET)
> From: "Maarten Brock"
> Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] SDCC preprocessor issue
> To: sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <44569.84.24.237.130.142265580
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
hello all,
thanks a lot for your feedback! As for your mails see my comments below
You forgot the option to modify SDCC so it accepts the __interrupt keyword
either before or after the function :)
w I figured that is not really an o
Hi Georg,
>> You forgot the option to modify SDCC so it accepts the __interrupt
>> keyword either before or after the function :)
>
> w I figured that is not really an option - is it???
Why would this not be an option? I guess it's not even a big change. Of
course the parser definition ne
hello all,
thanks a lot for your feedback! As for your mails see my comments below
> You forgot the option to modify SDCC so it accepts the __interrupt keyword
> either before or after the function :)
w I figured that is not really an option - is it???
> Are you sure? The Raisonance C
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
hello all,
as mentioned elsewhere I am trying to port the STM8-SPL library by STM to SDCC.
Currently I got stuck at a seemingly simple problem.
Here’s the technical background:
1) my target is to modify only the common headers, not the projec
Hi Georg,
You forgot the option to modify SDCC so it accepts the __interrupt keyword
either before or after the function :)
Maarten
> hello all,
>
> as mentioned elsewhere I am trying to port the STM8-SPL library by STM to
> SDCC. Currently I got stuck at a seemingly simple problem. Hereâs the
On 26.01.2015 20:51, Georg Icking-Konert wrote:
> hello all,
>
> as mentioned elsewhere I am trying to port the STM8-SPL library by STM
> to SDCC. Currently I got stuck at a seemingly simple problem. Here’s the
> technical background:
>
> 1) my target is to modify only the common headers, not th
hello all,
as mentioned elsewhere I am trying to port the STM8-SPL library by STM to SDCC.
Currently I got stuck at a seemingly simple problem. Here’s the technical
background:
1) my target is to modify only the common headers, not the project specific
header
2) all other supported compiler
10 matches
Mail list logo