Re: [Sdcc-user] Code size and functions

2006-07-06 Thread Maarten Brock
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sergio X > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 7:02 PM > To: sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Code size and functions > > > > > > 2006/7/4, Maarten Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Re: [Sdcc-user] Code size and functions

2006-07-06 Thread Jatin Bhateja
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Sdcc-user] Code size and functions     2006/7/4, Maarten Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Dave, I have been elected to be on the SDCC developer team, but I can assure I have had very little training in writing compilers at the university. I consider myself a trained profes

Re: [Sdcc-user] Code size and functions

2006-07-06 Thread Sergio X
2006/7/4, Maarten Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Dave,I have been elected to be on the SDCC developer team, but I can assure Ihave had very little training in writing compilers at the university. I considermyself a trained professional in writing software be it embedded or not, but I will not claim I'm

Re: [Sdcc-user] Code size and functions

2006-07-04 Thread Maarten Brock
Dave, I have been elected to be on the SDCC developer team, but I can assure I have had very little training in writing compilers at the university. I consider myself a trained professional in writing software be it embedded or not, but I will not claim I'm an expert on writing compilers. To m

Re: [Sdcc-user] Code size and functions

2006-07-04 Thread Peter
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Dave McGuire wrote: > Maarten Brock wrote: >> The code is bigger because SDCC is made by a few hobbyists, not by >> trained professionals who can spend all day working on it. > > Wow, THAT'S a pretty crappy thing to say. I don't know of too many > people who work on compiler

Re: [Sdcc-user] Code size and functions

2006-07-04 Thread Dave McGuire
Maarten Brock wrote: > The code is bigger because SDCC is made by a few hobbyists, not by > trained professionals who can spend all day working on it. Wow, THAT'S a pretty crappy thing to say. I don't know of too many people who work on compilers (whether they're shipped from a big shiny build

Re: [Sdcc-user] Code size and functions

2006-07-04 Thread Maarten Brock
Hello whomever you are, The code is bigger because SDCC is made by a few hobbyists, not by trained professionals who can spend all day working on it. The iram-size is 256 bytes on the DS89C430. So remove the option and keep the default. The ram-size is 1kB but if you don't want to use / initial

[Sdcc-user] Code size and functions

2006-07-04 Thread HardMaker
Hi list. I'm new in the 8051 world and I'm moving from Pic Micro. I have some questions about the options of SDCC.The first is: Why the code generate is a litle bigger than other compilers? I think I don't using the right options of the compiler. But I don't know what can I do. I'm using a Dalla