Thanks Maarten
Sorry, this happens to me every once in a while :(
Anyway if the statement can be understood in the way that the
code can be used but not distributed for commercial use then I
am still happy.
/Gudjon
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:08:30PM +0200, Maarten Brock wrote:
> Gudjon,
>
>
Gudjon,
I think you misunderstood me and missed the word "not"
in my reply. If you use SDCC for 8051 you DO use AS.
Only if you use it for PIC is AS not used, but it
uses the assembler and linker from gputils.
Maarten
> Hi
>Thanks for the answers. The new license is clear but
> I
Hi
Thanks for the answers. The new license is clear but
I understood the old in the way that both commercial
distribution and usage was prohibited.
But I am using the 8051 port so I don't use this code :)
It will be distributed in Debian under non-free but that is
fine by me. It would be nic
Hi,
You are neither doing publication nor
distribution of AS or ASLINK for commercial
use, so I don't see any problem. In other words,
you may not sell the hammer but you can sell the
chair you made with it. Compare the license of
the old AS and ASLINK used with sdcc (version
1.7)
That's odd. The terms "public domain" and "copyright" are
mutually exclusive. Stanford University defines public domain
this way:
The term "public domain" refers to creative materials that are
not protected by intellectual property laws such as copyright,
trademark or patent laws. The pub
Hello Gudjon,
The AS assembler and linker that come with SDCC are
not used for PIC development. Do you happen to use that
or are you using one of the other targets?
We did not create the AS assembler and linker, we
only adapted it to suit SDCC's needs. Writing those from
scratch will
Hi
The following licensing statement in the sdcc files was pointed
at me by coincidence:
"The AS assemblers and the ASLINK relocating linker are
placed in the Public Domain. Publication or distribution of
these programs for non-commercial use is hereby granted with the
stipulation tha
