On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Ben Shi wrote:
> And the for.c is in the standard regression test of SDCC
>
> http://sourceforge.net/p/sdcc/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/sdcc/src/regression/for.
> c
>
> sdcc for.c -mmcs51
> for.asm:175: Error: missing or improper operators, terminators, or
> delimiters
> for.asm:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 20.12.2013 02:48, schrieb Ben Shi:
> And the for.c is in the standard regression test of SDCC
>
> http://sourceforge.net/p/sdcc/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/sdcc/src/regression/for.c
>
>
>
> I use the latest code e8919 in the svn reposit, with configure
On 12/19/2013 05:40 PM, Masur Jonathan wrote:
> Le 19.12.2013 11:12, Dave McGuire a écrit :
>>Well, GCC supports AVR because people wrote AVR support into GCC. ;)
>> AVR is a bit more "compiler friendly" than, say, the Z80.
>
> Well, I'm not familiar with Z80, but by "compiler friendly" I gues
On 12/19/2013 05:48 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
>>> Well, GCC supports AVR because people wrote AVR support into
>>> GCC. ;) AVR is a bit more "compiler friendly" than, say, the
>>> Z80.
>
>> Well, I'm not familiar with Z80, but by "compiler friendly" I
>> guess this basically means RISC right
And the for.c is in the standard regression test of SDCC
http://sourceforge.net/p/sdcc/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/sdcc/src/regression/for.c
I use the latest code e8919 in the svn reposit, with
configure
make all
make install
在2013年12月19 16时22分，"Ben Shi"写道：
Sorry, the error info should be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.12.2013 23:40, schrieb Masur Jonathan:
> Le 19.12.2013 11:12, Dave McGuire a écrit :
>> Well, GCC supports AVR because people wrote AVR support into GCC.
>> ;) AVR is a bit more "compiler friendly" than, say, the Z80.
>
> Well, I'm not familiar
Le 19.12.2013 11:12, Dave McGuire a écrit :
>Well, GCC supports AVR because people wrote AVR support into GCC. ;)
> AVR is a bit more "compiler friendly" than, say, the Z80.
Well, I'm not familiar with Z80, but by "compiler friendly" I guess this
basically means RISC right ? Each operation ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.12.2013 22:33, schrieb Masur Jonathan:
> Hello guys, This might be out of topic, but while this was
> mentionned, I've asked me this question a few times so I hope
> somebody has an answer.
>
> How comes AVR can be targetted by gcc at all ? AVR
On 12/19/2013 03:58 PM, Jan Waclawek wrote:
>> There really doesn't seem to be much of a point; GCC's AVR support is
>> very good these days.
>
> True, however sad it may be.
It's sad that GCC supports AVR? What a thoroughly odd thing to say.
> SDCC certainly has potential to support 8-bitte
On 12/19/2013 04:33 PM, Masur Jonathan wrote:
> This might be out of topic, but while this was mentionned, I've asked me
> this question a few times so I hope somebody has an answer.
>
> How comes AVR can be targetted by gcc at all ? AVR might be RISC, true,
> but it is a 8-bit architecture, and
Hello guys,
This might be out of topic, but while this was mentionned, I've asked me
this question a few times so I hope somebody has an answer.
How comes AVR can be targetted by gcc at all ? AVR might be RISC, true,
but it is a 8-bit architecture, and the standard gcc compiler is
optimized for
> There really doesn't seem to be much of a point; GCC's AVR support is
>very good these days.
True, however sad it may be.
SDCC certainly has potential to support 8-bitters much better than gcc, but
it's unlikely anybody will invest into the avr branch now - it's easier to
learn to live with th
There really doesn't seem to be much of a point; GCC's AVR support is
very good these days.
I don't mean that as a statement against SDCC in any way; I love SDCC,
and have for many years. But its specialty is supporting small
processors (more small *architectures* than processors) that are n
It is dead. AFAIK it cannot generate correct code and there is no one
working on it.
> Hello,
>
> Is the AVR branch still alive? I see some updates in the svn reposit but
> why it is disabled by default while building?
>
> Can it be used or not?
>
> Ben
--
Hello,
Is the AVR branch still alive? I see some updates in the svn reposit but why it
is disabled by default while building?
Can it be used or not?
Ben
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business
Hello Ben,
Welcome to SDCC. But we really can't help you this way. You seem to expect
us to have a crystal ball in which we can read your for.c implementation.
Maybe you can send it to us?
Maarten
> Sorry, the error info should be
>
>
>
>
> sdcc for.c -mmcs51
> for.asm:175: Error: missing or im
Sorry, the error info should be
sdcc for.c -mmcs51
for.asm:175: Error: missing or improper operators, terminators, or
delimiters
for.asm:179: Error: missing or improper operators, terminators, or
delimiters
removing for.rel
在2013年12月19 16时18分，"Ben Shi"写道：
Hi,
I am new to SDCC and w
Hi,
I am new to SDCC and want to try it, however an error rises while trying it.
Anybody who can help me is highly appreciated.
My steps:
1. configure --prefix=/home/binshi/sdcc/build/
2. make all
3. make install
4. sdcc -v
SDCC :
mcs51/z80/z180/r2k/r3ka/gbz80/tlcs90/ds390/pic16/pic14/TIN
18 matches
Mail list logo
