Hello guys,
This might be out of topic, but while this was mentionned, I've asked me 
this question a few times so I hope somebody has an answer.

How comes AVR can be targetted by gcc at all ? AVR might be RISC, true, 
but it is a 8-bit architecture, and the standard gcc compiler is 
optimized for at least 16-bit CPUS right, because SDCC is separate from 
GCC for a reason, right ?

Or perhaps gcc doesn't target the same kind of AVR processor as those I 
used to code for in assembly ?

As for the MSP430, I know gcc supports it but I have no idea how good it 
is. I have used the IAR compiler when I had to target those.

Regards,
Jonathan

Le 19.12.2013 08:07, Dave McGuire a écrit :
>
>    There really doesn't seem to be much of a point; GCC's AVR support is
> very good these days.
>
>    I don't mean that as a statement against SDCC in any way; I love SDCC,
> and have for many years.  But its specialty is supporting small
> processors (more small *architectures* than processors) that are not
> supported or supportable by other common free compilers.
>
>    What I'd love to see is MSP430 support for SDCC...primarily because
> PDP-11 is a very short jump from there!  =)
>
>                 -Dave


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Sdcc-user mailing list
Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user

Reply via email to